Does the situation change at all if she responds and says that she’s still not interested in working with them? It seems like we’d end up at the same place if she doesn’t respond and if she responds with a negative. If this is all correct, they were trying to buy the strike away, and if she’s not able to be bought,…

The funniest part for me is the answer section for #4. It just starts “No.” as if there was any god damn chance I remembered what question #4 was in the first place.

Sounds like we fundamentally disagree on that. No big deal, man. 

The format of this article is truly wild and seems to want me to scroll up and down.  I straight up failed the quiz of “Can you remember 6 paragraph length questions in order when scrolling to the next page?”  I’ve shamed my family. 

After thinking about it a bit more, I think Steph’s bravado is more self-congratulatory and Trae’s is a bit more antagonistic to his defender, but I recognize that’s super subjective and not a universal truth. Steph just seems to be having real fun when he gets hot, and that’s infectious for me. I’m certain that…

As a Lions fan...

As a fan of neither the Warriors nor the Hawks, are we putting Trae in the same camp as Steph, in so far as how they shoot silly balls and gloat hard? There’s something less charming about Trae to me, but I haven’t watched too many Hawks games this year, so it may be a skewed sample size.

Revisiting this after the dust has settled with a 10-year and a 13-year contract would suggest that they were bluffing.

How official is the “ready” concept in tennis? I’ve played only casual fuck-around games, so I’m not sure how you’d verify that in an official way. Like in baseball, if you have both feet in the box, the pitcher can throw. Is there an equivalent in tennis?

I don’t disagree!  Cousins was just clearing the bullshit off the floor, and Lamb wasn’t putting his shoe back on until the next stoppage.  I was just thinking that that’s the only claims that the refs could make.  I suspect that’s the angle they work in the inevitable follow-up.

I’m surprised that they didn’t play the angle of “he was putting his opponent at a further disadvantage by making it more difficult to get his shoe back”, since that’s the only claim for the refs that I can even wrap my head around.

Beyond all the statements that are made (which I’m also here for), it’s just a dope look.  I’d wear it if I had an event that called for it. 

How pissed do you get at Jewish weddings?  

To whom are you suggesting that they aren’t fun? The spectators, the players, or both?

I don’t want to start a bullshit slippery slope argument based on how far down the field they should go, but when you’re on the sideline and your teammates does cool shit, running out to celebrate is pretty cool!

I couldn’t love the clause “..., urologically speaking” more.

the seattle EVVVEEENNNN FLOOOWWWWW

I’ve never had it happen to me (that I know of?), so I’m curious on how you know where it occurs.  Is it just like getting your card number stolen and then used elsewhere or is it a different beast entirely?

I thought the first one of this article was “Libtard” and I thought Billy had tried to turn heel on us. 

It would be analogous to the NFL if both teams were on the same sideline, but like, they ain’t. This is an example of why.