We apparently have different definitions of rare (or you're also including cultures where multiple male partners for women exist for other reasons than community child-rearing). That particular theory re: female orgasm, from what I've read, has also been suggested as a reason for monogamy. It's hard to claim either as…

Jennifer Aniston is promoting a line of hair care products

I don't think it sexual harassment, though. I just think it's inappropriate for the workplace. When the Obama and AG story was around, the general concensus around here was "just don't comment on a person's appearance unless you're buddies." I'm wholly confused why the standard doesn't apply to women - and no, I'm not…

GODDAMNIT FUCK THIS SHIT.

Damnit. One last try: <img src="http://replygif.net/151">

Oh, I believed you, I just can't wrap my head around it!

Maybe in my THE WORST list I should have just said "ALL THE WITCHES" because they all suck. Except Gina Torres. I would have watched an entire spin-off of her and Damon quipping back and forth with no shame. None at all, I tell you.

This is how I feel about all of this news.

Is she not on The Big C anymore? Or is that "Hereafter" episode that's been on my DVR for a while now just a one-off epilogue of sorts?

It's not even the men's fault, though. Phil is always super supportive of Claire (I will give him a pass on initially saying no to the job with his nemesis. Understandable) and even Mitch comes around eventually, and at least has the sense to keep his eye-rolling behind the scenes. I bet Jay would have a hard time…

I'm not a man, if that's what you're assuming, but thanks for the advice, I guess? It's unprofessional and unnecessary for anyone to comment on appearance in the workplace, unless one's looks are pertinent to one's job. Save that shit for happy hour.

Can't blame ya, babes. I am a secret masochist and watch TBBT all the time.

Right, I get that, but just because it IS a thing doesn't mean it SHOULD be, right? I fully admit I know very little nor do I care very much about the inner-workings of Hollywood, but it rubs me the wrong way that a trailblazer like Rhimes is playing into all these notions. The appearances of a director has literally…

Ha, yeah, I hope so too, if only so Klaus and new vampire leader (Marcellus? Was that his name?) in NO can bro out with animosity but always be brought back together by the baby, even while the witches are trying to kill him. Because I love that new dude already.

WUT. NO.

Well, shit, that is news to me. I think I have to rearrange some of my fantasies about Diaz now.

The only good thing about Chuck Lorre is the title cards at the end of episodes. It's almost been sad watching them get more and more depressing since the Sheen debacle.

The point is that those three shows are beloved to the point of being cultish, whereas Rhimes' shows often are relegated to "guilty pleasure" status. It's not irrelevant to make the comparison in ratings - it's making a salient point about how we tend to regard some of the most highly watched shows as fluff simply…

Rhimes ... tells one director, working late into the night, “You are so pretty and talented."

Yes! I wouldn't mind so much that they repeatedly show Claire failing miserably at everything she tries to do outside the home (unless, of course, a man steps in and fixes it) if it weren't for the fact that everything is so easy for everyone else trying to step out of the SaHP role in the show. I realize it's meant…