As if it’s my fault Dodge produced such a masterpiece

Surprised we didn’t get that one guy recommending this not-often heard of Charger from the oh-so-rare brand that no one knows: Dodge.

Did you say it wasn’t a cost competitive EV, and then just use the ID4 as the comparison?  LOL dude.  LOL.

Neat. Similar to GM part 15199033? Sierra 1500, Sierra 2500, Sierra 3500, Silverado 1500, Silverado 2500, Silverado 3500, Yukon XL 1500, Yukon XL 2500, Yukon, Tahoe, Suburban 1500, Suburban 2500, Avalanche 1500, Avalanche 2500, Escalade, Escalade EXT, and Escalade ESV.

checked the box for the auto to eliminate interest from enthusiasts

328d’s both sedans and wagons were auto only, no choice on that.

That paint and interior are well received among the BMW fans.

I will be perma-banning whoever said the Dodge Ram

I totally agree! But it’s also possibly that is still shorter than when compared to a traditional rack an pinion (or recirculating ball, or... you get the point).

Just a theoretical example: If it takes a driver 1 second to turn a traditional rack and pinion to full lock, what the fuck does lag matter on an electronic steering rack if it takes a driver 0.5s to get to full lock, plus 0.125s of lag. That would still be faster than a traditional system.

It is your fault for constantly reminding everyone you own we.  Like, we get it dude.

Jesus, you really do try to shove the Charger into everything. Get’s old as fuck real fast.

Wait... why is this Tesla’s fault?  It seems the respective brands can’t maintain their planned timelines for some reason.  None of them--at least in the article--are blaming Tesla for it.

I feel like today’s market is a better place to sell that than when it was originally released.

So yeah, screw this crap. I have no problem paying with cash—you see it flowing out of your fingers so the expense hurts like it should—as opposed to adding that expense to the credit card total as you “painlessly” roll it over and keep paying interest on the balance. Duh—cash is king.

I think you are being too critical for too little data. There are other videos out there that show what dual motor models can do with their locking differentials and with just traction control. It seems the new software changed a lot for off-road performance and it made a big difference.

My point is tires are entirely secondary to the primary attributes tested here. That’s why there’s often no mention of what specific tires (other than size) on the vehicles tested here. It’s not going to matter if you’ve got fresh KM02s or if they’ve got 45,000 miles on them. The results are going to be pretty damn…

That’s missing the point of a flex test, which is to gauge suspension and not traction.

The fact you think bald tires would affect this test is silly.  It’s a suspension travel, suspension flex, and frame test.  It’s largely not a tire traction/condition test.

Let’s say you are correct and the truck on its own is worth $15k (I disagree, BTW and I love 7.3s). The seller is still trying to get $35k for it. Then they want another $35k for a camper that retails for around $28k. Even with your math, this thing is worth $43k max.