goodishwill--disqus
Goodish_Will
goodishwill--disqus

Sorry to say, but this season has been going down in quality pretty fast.
I'll wait until you post your review of the final episode to comment further (since I wait for your review to be posted before I watch each episode) but it'll be a very heavy lift to drag this up from the nonsensical melodrama that this has

So at sometime (maybe during the next season he suggests, hopefully), they're going to have to explain how someone gets Trevor's job.
But then again, maybe he's been a douchebag for aeons so Eleanor doesn't get a stab at the top job, but it would be fun if she were appointed as his right-hand woman.

Well let's face it: this show needed a massive boot up the ass to get it going again and make it interesting. The recent plots (we found a safe place but dammit, due to us then it isn't any more!) were getting really tired.
Whatever your view of the violence involved then at least it brought home to many of the weary

This was utterly cliched cack.
You're a great reviewer, Lisa, so please devote your time and effort elsewhere since there are a lot more promising premieres to start the fall season review cycle rather than this fetid piece of tripe.

So the Capitol is blown up killing the POTUS and hundreds of other people, but the party just carries on inside the club where Kirkman's son is with nobody seeming to know what's just happened.
I'm guessing that realism isn't going to be this show's strongpoint.

Thanks, Zardoz (great film, by the way).
Cheers, Will.

Has Angela ever met Tyrell before?
I can't remember. :(

If the loan from China to E Corp was made in E-Coins, then that would hand power back to E Corp, maybe.
I must admit that I don't completely understand how bitcoin works, but if it were controlled by a corporation then couldn't they mine and pump far more E-Coins onto the market hence reducing the debt owed?
Or does the

"We’re like Elliot, feeling as though events are always unfolding just beyond eyesight, and the real truth of everything is somewhere outside our reach."

I have to ask myself "Why did Sonia (The reviewer) decide to dislike this from the start, and as the plot got thicker then decided that there was no way back from her initial dislike apart from tending towards disliking it even more?" My own observation rather than a quote.
It was involving, fairly realistic and a

"And I think all of that plays into the entire thesis of the show, which
is that if you're that one person in a million who's innocent but
somehow finds themselves in circumstances that tend to make them look
overwhelmingly guilty, you're fucked."

Yeah. That's why I put "demon" in quotes.
I don't think that they are "demons" as lore would have us believe but some sort of unworldly entities.
If they turn out to be aliens then it would ruin the entire show for me..

Don't they have blood spatter analyst (like Dexter) in New York?
This is the first time that we were shown the blood on the wall as far as I remember, so given that spray of blood then wouldn't Naz have been covered in blood if he was the murderer? Surely they'd have checked his clothing for her blood wouldn't they?
Why

I like the idea of this, but the execution has been woeful so far.
The only reason I'm still watching it is in the vain hope that Walton Goggins' character does something that is well written and actually makes me laugh.
At the moment then it's just mildly entertaining when it should be so much more given the talent

We saw him die so how the reviewer thinks that he may still be alive is beyond me,

Ah. I think it was you that I was referring to in my latest ramblings.
I reckon that there's definitely an initial reaction to those who get taken over and the severity of the takeover has some correspondence to the goodness or badness of that person, along with a timeline of how difficult it is for the "demon" to take

OK, I'm going to ramble on for a bit:
It seems like (as someone posted last week) the "demons" are trying to balance out the good and evil in the world: If you're a very good person and you get possessed then you turn into a very bad person for a while, and vice versa.
But then they revert to being more normal after a

It's an interesting title for the episode since "The Art of War" is the the only one of the three books that were mentioned that Naz hasn't actually read.
I reckon that he's in for a rough time from now on, since his survival strategy isn't very well thought out.

Time to postpone watching this season for me since I have better things to waste my time on, including inserting thermonuclear devices into rodents.
Did people really laugh out loud at any of this rubbish?
If you want creative inventive swearing then watch "The Thick Of It", and if you love Goggins then watch

Even the reviewer can't back this up with any sort of reason to continue watching apart from "it was far from a disaster".
I'd rate it as average for the first season of a TV series, so 5/10 for me.
Yes, I know. That's just my opinion and you can feel free to disagree with it, but this was definitely a case of throwing