gokartmozart89
gokartmozart
gokartmozart89

I agree. It’s prevented me from investing in a number of third party Nintendo controllers for my Switch. I suspect it has something to do with licensing, since it mostly seems to affect the officially licensed controllers.

I mean, I could have bought it on a better sale on PS5. But like HLD, Death’s Door, and Hollow Knight, this game is basically begging for me to play it on a handheld. 

Then it’s going to have issues if they want it to be a forever game. The more characters they add, the harder it’ll be to balance the game. The alternative is to introduce new characters, but remove some older ones, but we both know that people will get upset over that too. they wont be able to appease everyone.

Of those examples, I’ve only played the remake of Link’s Awakening. But in terms of feel, I would say the combat is closer to Cult of the Lamb. It’s a lot of dodge-rolling into and out of range of enemies to get a few swipes in, with every time you get hit being a fairly big blow to your overall health.

I mean, have you played something like Death’s Door or Hyper Light Drifter? Or even Link’s Awakening? Is it anything like either? Are the puzzles comparable? The combat seems like straight forward Zelda-clone fare. I like rolling up my sleeves and exploring an interesting locale while encountering some challenging

They weren’t nearly so arbitrary - you should read the original document. Their delineation is based on the fact that the Nintendo Switch is a gen 8 console, as opposed to a gen 9 console like the PS5 and the Series X/S. Their point is merely that Nintendo isn’t directly competing with Sony and Microsoft. People have

I fear you’re in the minority of not just Android but all mobile users. Your buddy is the majority. 

UGH

Skyrim Anniversary on Switch for the same $70 msrp as PS5 and Xbox is a joke. It’s already bad enough on those other two platforms, but the Switch version doesn’t even get the same upgrades. 

If it was that clear cut that this purchase would not eventually lead to Microsoft building a monopoly on the industry, then the FTC wouldn’t be spending their time on it. The long term effect of the purchase is at the heart of the debate.

Whether it’s the same effect is irrelevant. Acquisitions are not rendered illegal under anti-trust law. It’s about the scale and scope of the purchase and the potential impact on the overall market. Again, one game or studio vs a whole publisher makes a huge difference, and it’s why this proposed acquisition has

That’s not exactly what Microsoft said. They committed to continuing to support existing games on other platforms. Stuff like Fallout 76, Elder Scrolls Online, and releasing Doom Eternal’s next gen update on PS5. They didn’t promise to release new games like Starfield on Playstation consoles.

I read this in Ron Howard’s voice. Can recommend. 

Buying temporary exclusivity from a developer/publisher on a single game (or just buying a single studio like Insomniac or Bungie) is nowhere near the same as just outright buying one of the top three largest publishers in the world. Not to mention, the ink was still drying on the purchase of one of the other top ten

No, he’s not. Gen X is between Boomer and Millennials.

But it is making him money. To the point where I’m not going to click the link to the video to downvote, because I don’t want the algorithm to award him with another view.

I’m the big dumb idiot that got excited over getting The Matrix and Reservoir Dogs on blue ray and when my blockbuster went out of business. My priorities were the it of whack. 

WB licenses out movies to the other streamers if there’s money to be had. Harry Potter and The Matrix are good examples. I can see them doing it more often after this Discovery merger. That deal keeps looking worse all the time. 

At this point, if the movie in question is this hard to find, I want it in 8k just to be safe. Who knows how available it’ll be in 10-20 years. Especially if it’s a visually interesting film like this or The Fall.