When was the last time you watched it? He's gotten consistently better, the last couple of weeks especially, he was on fire.

How old are you?

Except. . . Yorick shows up in Hamlet, not Macbeth. . .

Honestly, I think he's pretty good. He isn't as sharp as Stewart and the great lines are fewer and farther between, but when he's on, it's great. Just the other night, he was talking about Brexit and the xenophobia that led to it, and he said something about how "You know who would've loved to have had a nice, clean…

More conflicting - Beach Boys, "Never Learn Not To Love." That's actually a pretty good song, except it was written by Manson.

She was also great in Grumpier Old Men, as Sophia Loren's mother.

. . . yeah, that was funny.

For what it's worth, I seem to recall that in the book, she still encounters her abusive husband and he still attacks/scars her, but she stops him by herself. (He kills himself in the book.) So she still gets away.

You. . . have seen the movies he's directed right? They're pretty darn good.

"That “honor” will forever be taken by Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles—Coming Out Of Their Shell rock tour that happened a year before Secret Of The Ooze was released."

And three hard boiled eggs.

Well, okay. . . the murder occurred in June '94, and the King verdict was April '92. It was still a key component in the OJ trial; the difference of a year and change still means little today, and meant even less in 1995.

Or Sean Gunn?

That, and they blatantly played the race card. Mind you, this was just two years after the Rodney King verdict and subsequent riots. They did a great job at suggesting there was a police conspiracy to target a black celebrity. Not proving, just suggesting.

I was in 9th Grade Speech class. We were supposed to take a test that day, and we did, but before it started we watched the verdict, and then during our test the teacher had the TV on the whole time.

Maybe if you already got away with murder, you figure that since society's rules don't seem to apply to you, common sense doesn't either? It helps explain the situation that actually did land him in jail.

Absolutely. It's in a totally different league than the other 30 for 30 docs, most of which are great.

And a much-loved role model. . . or, uh, perceived as a role model. Seriously, pretty much everybody loved OJ. 13-year-old me loved him enough, I held onto the belief that he wasn't guilty long after the evidence overwhelmingly pointed otherwise. And that was when I discovered cognitive dissonance, kids!

aka Too Many Cooks?

With or without nail polish?