Ok, i’ll ask my mouth women to be quiet.
Ok, i’ll ask my mouth women to be quiet.
I thought you were going to say by the unicorn instead of karma.
I had a book of spells at that age! I remember that the spells for strength or wisdom were super easy (light a candle, say a chant) and that the spells for “make this dude love you” included a unicorn horn and a stern warning to not use it in bad faith or you’d get buttfucked by karma.
GOD THE NERVE OF THIS WOMAN TO GO ON LIVING HER LIFE WHEN SHE IS A MOTHER I MEAN WHAT IS NEXT? LEAVING THE HOUSE? INTERACTING WITH OTHER HUMANS?!?!?!?!!? HAVING SEX?!?!?!?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?!?!?!?!?!
How is this enforceable? Are they going to station a police officer to watch her 24/7 and make damn sure that baby doesn’t latch on? This is ridiculous and the father who started all of this needs a good punch in the throat.
If I ever have a kid, and I ever split with the mother, I would hope that someone close to me would punch me in the balls if I ever tried to pull low-blow legal shenanigans like this...
women are legit not allowed to do anything w their own bodies except be fucking brood mares.
Wasn’t there a Fear Street book on this? The Girl in the Dress, or something? Buyer beware. It secretly intends to kill you.
I’m no fan of either Kurt or Courtney, so no skin in this game here.
Because they were contacted by a reporter who was doing a story on her not being black.
As a Wild fan, seeing the Blackhawks bounce us from the playoffs so often, I was tempted to hate them. But for one, they play damn good hockey, and for two, they atone for a fan-base that’s stuck with the likes of Jay Cutler. This is the least Chicago deserves until Cutler is out of there. Good work, Chicago. At least…
Patrick Kane already drunk.
Meanwhile here in the good ol’ USA, Sofia Vergara is alive and well to say how she wants her eggs used and it’s still going to court . . . (right? I haven’t missed an update on that story?)
The court opinion also noted that Dolezal claimed that the university’s decision to remove some of her artworks from a February 2001 student exhibition was “motivated by a discriminatory purpose to favor African-American students over” her.
The more this story unfolds, the more my head tilts like a dog who has heard something curious but incomprehensible.
The court opinion also noted that Dolezal claimed that the university’s decision to remove some of her artworks from a February 2001 student exhibition was “motivated by a discriminatory purpose to favor African-American students over” her.