Poor households are most likely to only have one internet connection, and to use a smartphone exclusively for internet access.
GnomeDeGary
gnomedegary
Also, let’s talk about smart phones. They are not luxuries. You want a job? You have to have a fucking phone. You want a job? You have to respond to email. Virtually everything these days is premised on internet access, so unless you expect poor people to huddle in a shack - these things aren’t luxuries.
Oh, fuck you. This isn’t just about deciding to spend money on healthcare. It is about having money to spend on healthcare at all and the horrible system of gotchas that these assholes are putting in place.
How are they going to deal with this whole thing that we are invading a galaxy? I mean, like there are some fucked up ethics here.
No, but the *justification* for drug testing poor people is rooted in the stereotype of the poor black welfare mooch who sits around and does drugs. There is a racial component in the interpretation of the individuals’ circumstances that drives the policies. The same type of bias can be see in how photos of disaster…
It is no different than when kids who are bullied start working with the bully - because at the end of the day at least it isn’t them.
Yes, and no. Identity is intersectional, so while yes, all things being equal being rich provides status benefits that being poor does not, being black or white (or Asian) modifies status too.
Geez. Can you get any more predictable or basic? If I am a SJW, then doesn’t that make you a social injustice warrior? A basic, angry, guy with a paper thin identity, clinging to the one thing you think makes you special. Sad.
I love this one: The quick dismissal by trying to claim that white guilt is behind this observation of fact, just like the rest of your crap deflections.
Oooo... Old school disproven shit about how it is not racism, it is just that you aren’t behaving nicely enough towards the white people.
It is cute that you think they would be given a place at the table. The only way they would be accepted is if they were meek and happy, and never brought up anything tough.
Well, my brown friends are probably better drivers than I am, but I have only been pulled over twice in my life while they get pulled over about once a month.
Lazy. No energy. Sad. Short enough?
So, if you don’t know how affiliate programs work and you wish to discuss it, why not Google the topic and come back with some facts instead of relying on other people to spoon feed you while continuing to make assertions that just aren’t true and easily avoided with a couple minutes or research. You claim that Amazon…
You asked for alternatives to Amazon. Those are alternatives to Amazon. If you don’t like the response, write better questions.
The point is a matter of control. Amazon isn’t doing something that benefits gawker and gawker misbehaves and they take it away. Gawker is doing something that benefits Amazon first, and they kick a few pennies back after they have the money. So, why would Amazon stop gawker from making Amazon a profit at no cost to…
Ethical wasn’t part of your criteria. Moving goal posts foul. 10 yard penalty.
Sur, but why would they do that? The Midwest wants to race to the bottom, so they get bottom feeder rates. If they did move there, they’d cut $5 or more off the wage.
Costco. Target. Sears. eBay. Walmart. Etc. There are tons.