How DARE they enjoy playing the game in a way that’s different from me. Just for that I’m going to make sure they can’t.
How DARE they enjoy playing the game in a way that’s different from me. Just for that I’m going to make sure they can’t.
Not an officer, but...
Because breakfast is superior to dinner in every way. 24 hour breakfast is where it’s at.
A bunch of people desperate to keep their culture from changing in ways they don’t want?
That mask is just a spray-painted triceratops mask, right?
Ah, but this gives them an excuse. The lack of diversity in the cast is an important part of the “plot”.
Weird thing is you can still go there directly, and there’s no indication somethings up.
I’ve noticed the term “a diverse actor” or “a diverse worker,”
I’d argue, in this day and age, *anybody* using a public phone in the lobby of a hotel would be suspected of being a vagrant.
It’s still a tinyass panel
Counterpoint:
Of ‘course, the offense Blizzard cited doesn’t say anything about no political messaging, but rather no saying something that offends the public. Nobody (who watched the students in a presumably more local tournament) was offended, (at least enough to complain) ergo no violation.
You generally shouldn’t be standing up in the aisle yourself until the row in front of you has pretty much finished exiting into the aisle and is walking down it, UNLESS you need to go back to get a carry on to bring it to where you were sitting. So one person getting up, going *back* for his carryon, then bringing it…
Except the people that would be most likely to do said “pranking” are the people that stand to benefit the most from her attitude.
1" sewing needles. Razors are boring (and too obvious)
Counterpoint:
Seriously? Seriously?
To be fair, I’m under the impression there are deceptive advertising laws that require a store advertising “up to X% off” to actually have at least 1 item that really is “X% off”. But that doesn’t mean it isn’t idiotic use of the language. Merely that the law has forced it to have a certain meaning.
You may actually want to read the source article and/or work on your reading comprehension. $6k worth of weed is what they DIDN’T buy. What the guy just had in his house. (No idea really on just how much weed that is, or how fast it goes bad, possibly personal stash so he doesn’t have to buy often?) The one guy still…
Eh, I have to agree with my Dad that the “quid pro quo” claim is a bit tenuous, if not completely nonexistent within the framework of the call itself.