I’ll be honest- I don’t care if cut scenes are made using hand puppets and comic sans, and combat is a variation of angry birds gameplay. I’m here for the characters, for the plot, for the relationships. Seems like I’ll enjoy myself!

The debate was spur of the moment, thinking on his feet with no time to apply a coating of bullshit to his viewpoints. Here he had time to prepare and cover the nastier parts of his views with the appropriate doublespeak.

What people are saying is that they think, based on your wording, that you think that Anita Sarkeesian is the equal-but-opposite extreme of the above Twitter users. That you understand they stand for opposite viewpoints is not in question; it’s that it *seems* like you think criticism from a feminist standpoint is the…

Do you honestly believe that? That GamerGate didn’t start as an attack on a random indie developer for allegedly cheating on her boyfriend? That people aligned with the movement haven’t sent tons of death and rape threats? That the whole “ethics in video game journalism” line was just a smokescreen to justify a bunch…

I’m sure there are. But Sarkeesian isn’t one of them. Hence your initial statement was still off-base. I don’t know why you won’t just admit you said something dumb instead of expending so much effort to defend it.

You’re the one that doesn’t get it. There’s nothing extreme about Sarkeesians viewpoint or behavior.

How the hell is a critic who makes a series of straightforward, non-polemic, feminist-theory-101 videos, and who makes an effort to emphasize the distinction between critiquing a game and attacking it (or the people behind it), IN ANY WAY COMPARABLE TO THESE ABUSIVE, IGNORANT, MISOGYNIST JACKHOLES?

Turn it into rent-controlled apartments for refugees.

Or he is actually SO inexperienced/uneducated he actually thinks the President wields supreme power.

A+ for comment/username synergy.

Because you’re an asshole.

My brain refuses to learn how to pronounce his name. Keeps telling me “Prince Reebus.”

There will never be a more qualified woman candidate than Clinton in a long time. She served as Secretary of State for the United States for the past seven years, after eight years as a senator for New York, the 3rd largest state in terms of electoral votes, after serving for eight years as First Lady of the country…

I will keep saying this for the next four years:

You haven’t done shit for anyone - women, black people, gays, Muslims, Latinos, disabled people, uninsured fucking children. Hillary Clinton has. She’s a fucking American hero. Your feelings, convoluted and disgusting as they are, are your business and the stupid fucking pure example of why she lost. She was supposed…

A friend of mine who comes from a Muslim family (not sure if he himself is Muslim) posted up about the Muslim guy that was murdered. None of th articles actually stated that he was murdered but he was attacked, beaten and died as a result of the beating. Not one article said murder.

Hillary’s candidacy meant a lot of things to a lot of people— many of them women who have been consistently passed over in their professional lives in favor of less qualified men. It seems really shitty to mock people for feeling badly for her, much less to make the ridiculous assertion that such feelings are the…

Wherever I say “we’rea two party system, especially for president.” My brother-in-law likes to point out that that can change if we change it!!!!!!¡. He doesn’t caucus. He’s not involved with local elections. He’s not running for anything. He’s just a tool who thinks he matters by virtue of existing. SMGDH

“Different viewpoints need to be respected,” he continued, before explaining that the Republican presidential candidate’s positions have been misinterpreted. “When Trump says he wants to ban Muslims, he doesn’t really mean that. That’s never going to happen. What he really means is he wants extreme vetting.”