Sure, but that’s almost a meaningless statement, isn’t it? To label something ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ in a moral valuation is an exercise in total subjectivity that’s usually reserved for children and mental defectives.

Let me see if I follow the logic here.

What are you on about, Sir? You’ve objected to my commentary, but neglected to mention why you’ve taken issue with it.

I’m not sure where you live, but this is America. We spend $600,000,000,000 a year on a military complex that exists exclusively to solve problems by killing people. This fella wasn’t the first to think of it, and I wasn’t the first fella to understand his logic.

Oh I’d say it’s gumption at the very least.

Or hero. In a perverse sort of way.

No, that’s actually not a thing. There’s no law that says anything to that effect. And if there is, please post a link because I’d be very curious to read it.

I find the entire grounds for this case a bit vexing.

You think too much of the American people. That powder keg will be washed away by a tidal wave of public apathy.

Your reasoning is as classy at it is cogent. You should run for office.

Oh, you’re referencing random unsubstantiated stories that don’t pertain to the Lewinsky affair. How did I miss that?

A sexual predator? He had consensual sex with an adult woman. Am I missing something, or do you have a very strange definition of ‘sexual predator’?

There’s no such thing as monsters.

They say that history doesn’t repeat, but it does rhyme.

I’m all for naming streets after celebrity child molesters.

Mr. Tillerson’s speech was an exercise in hypocrisy, although he does raise an interesting point.

Trump can’t denounce the Klan. His presidency is built on the political polarization of the American public. It depends on fear. It depends on bigotry and hate. He is the orange devil whispering in our ear - an instigator of discord, and a reflection of our worst selves. He is the Klan, manifest as a punchy old man in…

This is tedium. But here we go:

I think I understand the sentiment. They want to make America like a country club, where only the creme de la creme can get in.

I’m not sure where you’re getting any of this. I don’t deal in childish dichotomies like ‘good’ and ‘bad’. Neither have I suggested that the police have the ethical high-ground by virtue of their profession, nor have I made any reference to race as it pertains to this scenario. I’d appreciate it if you’d respond to…