I tell this to my b Bernie supporting FRIENDS. Like do you seriously think trumps team wasn’t going to hit him with the socialism and being Jewish? People freaked out because JFK was Catholic. They tried to delegitimize Obama on the premise that he was a Muslim and he ran on a progressive platform. Bernie would be…

But Bernie would have won! I just know it. Because of a poll early in the campaign. Trump would have never attacked Bernie for being an old, Jewish socialist from Vermont. Hillary was the worst candidate in the history of democracy. She only won by 3 millions votes. Bernie would have won at least 3 million more plus…

If society wouldn’t be such fucking prudes about “murdering people in cold blood” then he wouldn’t have been in this predicament in the first place! Check mate.

5 YEARS $40 MILLION TO PLAY A SPORT.

I like how you swiftly brush aside the multiple murders and other unknown crimes thing before moving on to the generic mea culpa of society failing Aaron Hernandez. Aaron Hernandez failed Aaron Hernandez. He failed as a human being, as a father, as a member of society. The world is a better place without him.

Au contraire, dude

You have to be kidding me. Society didn’t make him shoot people. He did. This isn’t stealing food because he was hungry, it was shooting someone who might have pushed him in the club.

As a member of society, I speak on our behalf.

Lol society failed a gifted, popular athlete with an extremely bright future and a massive multi million dollar contract? Yeah, he drew a really bad hand. If only there was something society could have done for him. More adulation, more opportunities! None of this was his fault. /s

Society failed him? Are you fucking kidding me?

Oh give me a fucking break. Society failed him by making him an idolized millionaire? Get a fucking grip.

Me, defiantly:

It’s Kansas so it could just as easily been a thriving metropolis 6 years ago before Sam Brownback was elected governor.

Literally nobody here is disagreeing with the point that circumcising babies’ penises is problematic at best, since babies are incapable of giving consent. What people are disagreeing with is your insistence that there is no difference between circumcising a penis and “FGM,” a term that includes clitoridectomy, not…

First of all, you are a male, with a penis. Who suffered male genital mutilation. Stop trying to colonize women’s issues. Second, you really can’t see how petty and childish and straight up ridiculous you are coming off by trying to change the focus onto your own issues? This is not a competition you know? The story…

You may be a woman, but you are not female and do not have female genitals. Ergo, you cannot have had female genital mutilation.

No, a cis woman came in and sprayed her privilege all over this article and made it about how right she is to view FGM as being far worse than all other genital mutilation.

No, a cis woman came in and sprayed her privilege all over this article [...] “Cutting of parts of dicks is totally cool guys”. [...] But she wanted second wave brownie points, so here we are. Yay.

The conversation about removing the foreskin is indeed an important one, but this is a conversation about mutilation of the vulva, clitoris, and labia, for the purposes of inhibiting a person’s sexual desire and agency. Removing the foreskin of the penis is not about preventing penis-havers from feeling or seeking…

Did I ever say they weren’t? I specifically said biologically and publicly identifying as for a reason. And no I will not get out of here because you decided to come in here and derail an issue and make it about you. And if you can’t see how that bullshit “but what about circumsion” arises every single time FGM is…