Yes, I would. If someone were questioning Bristol’s paternity I would also find that mean-spirited and pointless. I have a lot of issues with that family, the DNA connections between them are irrelevant.

All of your points are absolutely valid, but they also back up my point. This information, if Chelsea wants it, is relevant to her. To drag it into the public sphere with this tone of “Bill isn’t her real dad” is mean-spirited, hurtful, and completely unnecessary.

Oh I definitely agree with you on that. But that’s part of why I think the story is so awful—it reminds me a lot of the Khloe rumors in that it’s kind of based on looks and primarily serves to make the daughter in question feel like shit and slut-shame the mother.

Honestly, it’s not. The man whose sperm created Chelsea doesn’t matter. She was raised by Bill and Hillary and is their daughter.

I hate all these celebrity paternity stories (this one, the constant rumors about Khloe Kardashian, etc.). Regardless of the DNA test, Bill Clinton is her father. That’s how parenthood works. Biological origins are useful for medical histories, and that’s about it; they are certainly of no use to the public. All of…

Oh man, you didn’t even pick the best Bryan Fischer ones. Can you say Insane Overreaction?

It’s the linked one she says she can’t bring herself to re-type!

That’s what I think is so weird. Like crediting them would be an acknowledgement of their original work, engender some good will, and wouldn’t detract from his piece at all. So why not do it, unless you’re trying to pass the whole thing off as your own? Or maybe he was worried they’d say no, and in the typical fashion…

Oh my god, the George Clinton episode and the Tim Gunn episodes both send me into literally tears of laughter. I never felt strongly about either man before, but now I am totally enamored of both.

I will NEVER get over the disappointment of Peter Sagal not interviewing Kim K. His mixture of kindness + poking fun is delightful, and I would have loved to see what he did with Kim.

From your comment to the WWDTM bookers’ ears!

Exactly. EXACTLY.

I think that

This is EVERYTHING in my life today.

So your argument is that women suffer more as a result of unintended pregnancy, and therefore it’s okay to shame women more when an unintended pregnancy happens? That is literally the most bonkers logic I’ve encountered today, and I spent the morning with kindergartners.

WAIT, WAIT, WAIT. Isn’t this this “cunt punt” insane email chick? I’d expect nothing less than this exact response from her.

Gotta love how all the judgment is thrown that the woman, and not at any of the 25 dudes who had sex with her, presumably quite well aware of what was going on.

A-fucking-men. I've had some very enjoyable romps with members of the Navy. Wrap it up, though, those higher STI rates are legit.

This is the best advice for travel in general. I've never failed to have a fabulous time with the various Aussies I've met while traveling about.

Part of why this matters is that rapists use their possible custody rights to coerce women into dropping charges or agreeing to deals. So terminaing their rights off the bat would help to prevent rapists from using the threat of a custody battle to get women to drop charges or agree to lesser sentencing.