This was a very fun game; even if the movie wasn’t good I thought this concept was awesome. The sensation of speed was excellent and the controls were responsive, like being able to rotate your racer by 90 degrees so you could fit through narrow points in the track or to help you navigate tight corners.

Thank you for sharing this, Stef - I think with the more recent media coverage surrounding concussions, it’s starting to get more serious attention, but everybody needs to buy into it - team owners/managers (whether it’s racing or football or any other sport), fans, and the players.

It would make my Hyundai louder, stiffer, and faster: this would still result in a car that’s uncomfortable and slow. Louder would normally be alright but you don’t want to attract too much attention in my car.

While I find this a bit harsh, Red Bull has enough talent to do as they please with driver placement. Normally if you don’t perform at Red Bull you’re dropped entirely, so Kvyat still has a chance to improve and show his worth.

Heck, even if I could unlock a Senna helmet for the Mii character it would be a small, but nice bonus. There’s probably some sort of issue because of the fact that Mario Kart 8 already advertises for Mercedes by having the old Silver Arrow, one of their crossovers and one of their convertibles in the game.

Cars that no one here could afford got ruined by people who can afford to buy them and repair them. No one is worse off.

I’d imagine it’s an audio system override which make it start playing this:

Even if Evans was out, the other five (plus the Stig) are who I really want to see anyway.

All it needs is an Audi S or RS badge and we're good to go.

I think it’s all about mentality. If you want to have fun driving, you can in most cars. The longer I go on with an interest cars, the more I realize that hard-headed, unilateral thinking about what’s “fun” is silly - everyone’s perfect car is different and their idea of what’s fun in terms of driving is so dependent…

I think Rallycross is shown on YouTube; I don't recall if it's live or not, but I know they have whole races uploaded.

The end of year story would be great, but I have trouble thinking of what would be written in articles throughout the rest of the year. Plus, it would've made that warranty coverage pointless, and we can't have that.

I say this without any hatred or ill will, but the rare variable valve timing repair couldn't have happened to a better person. This adventure wouldn't have been any fun if you had purchased the world's most reliable Aston Martin. I look forward to what the rest of the year will bring.

Perhaps that was phrased wrong: I didn’t mean anything in regards to tire cost but rather if technological advances have lessened tire wear or if it’s an inherent flaw in any four-wheel steering system. Porsche implies higher costs and complexity compared to a Honda, and there’s no question modern systems are better…

I didn’t realize it was so bad on tires or so complex. This might be difficult to answer, but is this a problem inherent to four-wheel steering systems or was it a limitation of the technology at the time? I mean, would the four-wheel steering system in a 911 GT3 also have the same issues with tire wear and mechanical…

Given the praise, I wonder why Honda didn’t pursue four-wheel steering more. I don’t think it should only be for performance cars - now that cars are so big and heavy, if a company had a well-developed four-wheel steering system it would be a clear advantage over competitors.

“Hey, Toyota; do you have any engines we could buy?”

That looks nice - I’d finish it off with the tricolore on the rear wing.

Enthusiasts are a miserly bunch. Even if it was under $20k we’d still find something to bitch about.

Ah, I didn’t realize he was having difficulty with the handbrake. World RX does have a lot of those tight handbrake turns, so it would be a detriment.