Pretty sure that within 20 years, the only one of these things that will still be viable is the nukey shelter

Al Franken

Mediocre? Looks like someone is an optimist.

Ah, then who the hell cares about some impossible comparison? Absolutely no team is equal to another team from history. I’m sure they would much rather win another Super Bowl than be a statistical analogue to a completely different team playing under a completely different set of conditions with a completely different…

Missing the point though: if he could pull off 2 Super Bowls without the benefit of the Brown/Bell combo, considering that Bell played his first playoff game last week, and has an improved offensive line, who’s to say he can’t “pull off” another?

He “has been this way for years,” yet had a patchwork OL and no playmakers on the level of Bell and Brown. So who says they can’t back it up?

As a kid/teenager, I used to “showerboard” myself, keeping a bath rag over my face as the shower plastered it across my nostrils and mouth. It was kind of a rush.

I’m sure if Brady had to face the likes of the Lions and Bears, his passing stats would be much more depressed.

Actually, Dom is on his shit

Winner winner, spicy wing dinner

1. Granted

Appreciate the sentiment, but that doesn’t count; it has to be “universally beloved” celebrities whose deaths cause people to flagellate themselves with performative self pity on social media.

Just wait until we have to deal with the actual Trump presidency, and think of how many celebrities you’d gladly sacrifice to make it end.

The message is sound, but this doesn’t seem like the best example. Haphazardly jumping into a security dispute isn’t usually an advisable course of action.

The number 1 rule in hating is never give your target the benefit of the doubt.

The Raiders lost their starting QB and now their Super Bowl hopes are in jeopardy? You sure you want to go out on that limb?

He say he would “never say another man’s name like that” in reference to thanking them. Sounds like a dick to me.

33 here, check your math again!

Any particular reason why this article is framed as clueless corporate male sexism but doesn’t mention that the company is owned by women?