“no mid engine cars”

The fuck?

I am 100% on board with cars having names. The alphanumeric thing kind of puts everything a manufacturer makes into an anonymous “Sure, an Audi I guess” territory.

Given the sales delta between the 2, im sure they are happy they build it like they built it - strong enough to make it to the next generation release for a trade-in

No, it’s not. Everyone forgets about Raidillon, the part where all the crashes happen.

I’d have been tempted to sell half my fleet to buy this thing.

We can fix that.

Everybody needs to leave my mustang suv baby alone now...

Erik: This SUV is more than you’ll ever need.

This is what Mercedes thinks of us?

Well. When a Mach-E smokes a GT in acceleration tests maybe they’ll change the name of the ICE one to Probe.

Eddington, really?

Eddington approves.

ok boomer

I recently took my dad to see Bob Seger and the Silver Bullet Band and even at 92 years old (or whatever) he still rocked. He should be, like, No. 40 or something.

Extremely minor counterpoint: Nautilus is entirely too good a name to be slapped on just another bland, misshapen CUV.

Yea I really don’t get Jalopniks hangup on this. They even know there is a more powerful CT4 and CT5 coming but they are still going on about “how badly these cars were received”.

Another reason to like Lincoln despite their lack of sedans. Corsair, Nautilus, Aviator, Navigator, Continental, f@&king fantastic names. If they finally redesign the MKZ back into the Zephyr I would be over the moon.

They aren’t just Photoshopped, they’re poorly Photoshopped. Look at how awful the rear brake/wheel looks in the first shot.

3. Relatively low cost of ownership.

I’m not sure if he’s into Jaguar cars or the football team, but either way you think he’d be used to failure.