I’m sorry but how is this not minimizing the wiggle room? The ruling literally came down to semantics. It seems like unless every potentiality has been accounted for, you’re going to say the FIA is a farce.

Are you new to sports, or...?

huh?

Did you mean “born too early?”

No one is arguing that trains are faster than planes. (if you read carefully I said “easier, safer, more economical and more environmentally friendly”)

But what if travelling by train is easier, safer, more economical and more environmentally friendly than flying?

LMAO

Why would the traffic in the cities affect them if they took a train?

And... what qualifies you to make that judgement?

Have you ever traveled to a country with a modern high-speed rail system?

Unless there’s a Jeep derivative of that vehicle in the pipeline which I would not be surprised by..

Low Rider plays awkwardly in the background

Definitely this little Alfa Tipo 33 Stradale.

Just like Buick, Cadillac, Bentley and Rolls Royce they can easily position it as a sort of old-money kind of luxury, if it’s marketed well. Something Buick and Chrysler have struggled with so far, though.

I remember when people said that about the badge above.

It seems like they’re positioning Chrysler as a dedicated EV brand. So I think there’s no need to move the Cherokee - they seem like they want a brand for mainly SUVs, a brand for mainly trucks (Ram) and a brand for mainly performance vehicles (Dodge). So now they will have an all-EV brand (Chrysler).

Are we just using “canceled” for everything now? We have other words, I think. Like shuttered, eliminated, folded, phased-out.

That dark-grey rocker panel is doing so much work in making this thing not look frumpy.

Hideous..? Okay. Curious what would have been a better direction, in your opinion.

My takeaway here is that you have no idea what badge engineering means.