If it were just paying $60 for the game and not a subscription fee, I'd be all over it. Sadly, nope. Not paying a utility bill for a single game.
If it were just paying $60 for the game and not a subscription fee, I'd be all over it. Sadly, nope. Not paying a utility bill for a single game.
If it were attacking my dog, regardless if it could have succeeded in killing my dog, I'd have made sure that it never had the chance to try it again.
That solved the problem...
I don't care what animal it is, I'd have done the same thing. If it's attacking my beloved dog, it's getting thrown, and probably killed, not just out of blind rage but also because I don't want it coming back or attacking anything else. Its life does not matter to me, my dog's life does. If it attacks my dog, I'd…
Yes, I can definitely see the deficit in Pixels Per Krundel in this video.
...No I can't. I can't tell a difference between the two worth a crap. I mean, some of the textures look better on the PS4? Other than that, I can't really tell the difference.
Any higher-trained eyes care to clarify?
This is one of the best movies. Ever.
"I'm pretty tired...think I'm gonna go home now."
Tomb Raider: Definitely not a cash-in Edition.
That's horrible. I'm sorry to hear that, Justin. Looks like we'll all be in the same boat with you pretty shortly...
That doesn't really work when almost everything is either dependent on Internet connection or uses it to some degree.
Can you imagine?
Thousands of gamers looking at games and sighing, "This game looks amazing...but there's no way I'd be able to play it longer than a day because of my data cap."
or,
"This online game looks amazing, but I can't afford the Internet speed plan to be able to play it."
No, they'll create a Feedbackula or ThePoint about it.
Oh, come on, surely you could have squeezed in a few more descriptors on what kind of terrible troll I am! Clearly, you never read a single one of those articles, which provided links to Microsoft's now-edited (edited soon after E3 in June 2013) website regarding their policies.
Adorable.
Nice strawman you've got there. Too bad it's incredibly apparent that your little attempt at a retort is a strawman. Come back when you've learned to have a real discussion rather than try to cry louder.
You know what, I think I'm ok with being labeled by a troll by you, I honestly wouldn't want to be by anyone other…
Now that appeal will be gone for a lot more people who enjoyed it.
Yep.
"Let me make this perfectly clear. Your initial statement referenced lies. I pointed this out. You referenced one of these things that were misquoted and then misrepresented it. I provided a more factual and general response. You denied it solely on the basis you disagree. You then denied me and violated every rule of…
+1. Get up there, you.
As I expected, you don't have a valid argument. Perhaps I should ask you the same thing. Denying anything the opposing party states as "Nope, nope. Lie. Dumb. Nope" doesn't really scream "professional." It proclaims your insecurity for all to see. Tell me, what is your actual platform? Other than posting contrary…
Cute. Perhaps you should go read up on the definition of what a lie is. You're an expert in believing and defending them. Maybe you're just posting here because you want be "edgy." I don't know. Every single one of your posts on this article has been in favor of anti-consumer policies and advocating the greed of major…