I guess it could have been a reasonable question if it were framed as “Do you think that the floods have distracted the Rockets and affected their performance, thus contributing to your wins?”

My girlfriends grandfather once asked me if I had a cock. I told him yes and sat there for a full minute awkwardly making minimal eye contact. He got up and brought back a Coke. That language barrier can fuck up any conversation.

I don’t really know what this means but I was having a conversation with a friend yesterday and we talked about this specific angle...that it seemed in the video replay that he was struggling a bit to get the whole question out. I think the angle he was going for is weird, and he does need to rethink that, but at the…

Two old white dudes screaming at each other about something that 94% of the population either doesn’t understand or doesn’t give a shit about.

That’s true. Those Baby Boomers (and particularly not the greatest generations (tm)) would never have been so me-first as to lose a ball in the lights. Your rods and cones just have to Want It More.

Wow. So Hillary’s supporters are as wrong about basketball as they are about politics, economics, foreign policy, and social justice.

If Curry’s ankle/knee are really bad, you can add “no shot of winning and may as well stop showing up”

yep they are just alike

More like Johnny Maninacell

It's relevant when a family is trying to smear the police department and their deaths were in the commission of a crime.

This all comes down to the fact that Conor knows he can’t get in Nate Diaz’s head. Before the last fight, he thought he could, but now he knows he can’t. He’s not rolling out there with “balloon animals with one hand, gang signs with the other” type lines for this fight because he knows it’ll fall on deaf ears and…

I’m sorry, I’m calling bullshit.

No they arent at all. Conor is blowing it for Conor. You can’t sign a contract agreeing to specific mandatory press events and then say no. If he did all of this shit a month ago, and had his facebook post, and tweet and all that nonsense there would be no issue.

He blamed the perpetrator in 12 sentences. He blamed the victim in 0 sentences. He mentioned actions a victim can take that would help them be less likely to become victims in 5 sentences. There's a big difference between the latter two types of statements. You're allowing your emotions to rule your side of the debate…

I just don't understand why the victim's actions can never be discussed.

Your dissertation needs work.

No, friend, he's not a sports player of some sorts. He's a man who gets paid to express his opinion on TV every day. Good rant otherwise, though.

i disagree that he is comparing them to dogs. he is saying that the distraction of a superstar player returning to the league after two year in prison for commit a horrific crime is at least as distracting as some guy who is trying to earn a job on the NFL team who happens to be openly gay. (Vick should be way more…

If you think the analogy was between gay people and dogs I think you missed the point. Granted, both of these turds are total nitwits, but you're way off with that one.

Except he didn't, because he compared the people who get upset about gay marriage to the people who got upset about dog fighting.

Skip Bayless has plenty of shit to crucify him for without just inventing things from whole cloth.