geraltcloud9
geraltcloud9
geraltcloud9

“We are testing having one dedicated space for people to keep up with their friends and family, and another separate space, called Explore, with posts from pages.”

“Do you have any idea how much time it would take to parse an 11-minute video into a transcript?”

Agreed. Watching the replay, it doesn’t look like he’s an “escape artist” so much as the Skins just rushed past him. Standing there waiting to be sacked only to realize that all the guys trying to tackle you have been pushed behind you isn’t really the most impressive of maneuvers. When I clicked on the link I figured

If only the investigation was being done by internet commenters instead of the authorities, we might actually find the truth.

It makes me sad that your comment has 12 stars :(

Eh. I’m a child of the 1980s, so this should be right up my alley. But the only thing that I can see to explain its popularity is just how aggressively “EIGHTIES!!!!” it is. It perfectly encapsulates just how driven by nostalgia we have become in our choices of entertainment. I thought it was perfectly fine- I enjoyed

I can only imagine how exciting it would have been for someone to watch me read this review.

“...lots of people are saying it. The best people.”

This one’s on me. I picked Carolina to win in my office pool, and the Panthers seem dead set on screwing me over every week. My bad.

“But Schwarzenegger’s cultural analysis doesn’t quite stack up. If anything, Last Action Hero is the perfect Clintonian action movie. Its postmodern, meta-filmic sensibility, which has its star playing a fictionalized version of himself in a magic world where action movies are real, fits right in step with a political

Given the number of things you’ve deflected and changed the subject on when I’ve asked them, how about you just answer my question first.

Ay yi yi. A) Why do you think I put promise in quotes above? B) I’m not sure what you think I’m insisting. Again, go back to the very first sentence I wrote on this thread to see what I’m insisting.

C’mon man, seriously? I assume now you’re just trolling.

Lol, not a binding promise. I went back and edited that after I posted it, but I didn’t actually think you’d be so gung ho that you’d take the very first sentence I wrote after trying to find some common ground and find some semantic thing to quibble about.

How is that imprecise language? He literally says “I’m making a decision to do X. If things change, I’ll reconsider this decision.” I’m not “buying” that explanation- I’m literally reading what he wrote and interpreting it honestly. I gave you the direct quote. Look up the press release. It’s part of an entire

That quote is directly addressed in the article above. I’m not sure why you’re trying to use it as if it means that he’s saying he’ll reconsider the determination on whether or not to prosecute. Here’s the context of that particular sentence. “The District Attorney does not intend to expound publicly on the details of

“If you buy it, you’re an idiot.” Who is buying it? 

*sigh* I honestly should’ve checked your user name before responding to the first comment since I’ve had to deal with you before. Listen, if you had actually wanted to engage in the subject I’d be all for it. But you’re not actually responding to my comments, nor are you responding to the actual quotes or issues

ok