geraltcloud9
geraltcloud9
geraltcloud9

Hundreds? Did you mean hundreds of thousands? Even that would be a pretty low estimate of just how much stupid driving is currently on youtube :)

The only thing lame about bringing gloves to stadiums are the idiots that judge people for it. I haven’t done it since I was 10, but if I see a 50 year old with a glove at a game I don’t think anything other than “glad that guy is having a good time.”

No doubt the Yanks and their fans did NOT get hosed. It was a home run even if the stands were completely empty. This isn’t controversial or close at all.

I feel like these are all good suggestions for having a good party, but not necessary for people who don’t drink. I’m 36 and quit drinking ten years ago (as John Mulaney once said- I used to drink, and then I drank too much and had to stop). Most parties I go to nowadays are just people hanging out at someone’s house

Agree to disagree. Jim WAS really funny...like 5 years ago when Deadspin started using him for everything. Now it’s just loud and predictable.

Great, thanks!

Great, thanks!

Also, for the love of god, can someone come up with something more creative than Jim Ross? Seems like its what they use EVERY friggin’ time they highlight a big hit. It’s like the way deadspin still calls a home run a “giant dong” all the time b/c (hehehehe) someone thought they were making a funny penis joke like 7

“Humans are only meant to drink milk as infants.”

Thank god some people in the comments section are interested in science and actual nutrition. This article is horrific. I’m appalled lifehacker allowed it to be put up on their site. It’s pure nonsense. It’s like telling everyone in the world that they shouldn’t eat peanuts because some people have peanut allergies,

“It’s problematic to present an opinion column as factual reporting.” It’s even more problematic when you consider the author who wrote the piece disclosed in the comments section (but not the article) that he’s ALWAYS been anti-milk. So you have someone with a preexisting personal bias taking an opinion piece and

This is absurd. People who have celiac disease should avoid gluten. People who are lactose intolerant shouldn’t have lactose. Otherwise, milk is a solid source of protein and many vitamins and nutrients. Would you also point out that people shouldn’t eat tofu or pork for protein because certain cuts of beef are BETTER

Holding down the sleep button until the “slide to power off” option comes up turns off the phone.

Man, the creature effects in the 80s were so much more unsettling than today. I can take anything from modern horror movies, but the 80's movies STILL freaks the shit out of me, and I’m 36.

Exactly. This just seems like victim blaming to me. Some people saw an old white guy living in Carolina and immediately jumped to the conclusion that a) he must be racist, and b) therefore he must have deserved to get punched for some reason. I listened to the video a dozen times and I can’t think of any other reason

Yeah, I’m sure that the victim was really throwing racial epithets at a white couple, and everyone else there was such a-holes that they all joined along in randomly throwing out inflammatory language that doesn’t even apply to the assailant. Probably dropped some derogatory terms about Japanese and New Zealanders

Exactly- as an American of Irish/English descent, that guy looks exactly like my racial demographic. I don’t see anything about that couple that says hispanic, and if you actually listen to the video there are a ton of other words that it sounds like he says that make way more sense in context.

Is there any evidence any one actually thought that guy or his girlfriend were hispanic? Listening to the tape, I’d say spic would be like guess #127 on what he said there. “Respect”, “sit back..”, etc etc. etc. all sound more likely than a racially inflammatory remark that doesn’t even seem accurate for the people

Then what’s the point of mentioning it? If you think that he’s saying spic then just say “I think he says spic”. Don’t cite to a source if you don’t want the source to be relevant to people’s interpretation of your claim.

Nope, I thought that too. I was like “umm, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12. What are you talking about?!”