geraltcloud9
geraltcloud9
geraltcloud9

The reason for the comparison was pointing out that I don’t care at all that my information is already available to the public- I wouldn’t care if I lived in a home either. How many home invasions occur on the level of an oceans 11 raid each year where the robbers use detailed schematics and layouts to break in, as

“The only meaningfully new frontier of ball-dominance and offensive centrality left for Kyrie to reach is the lunatic height Oklahoma City’s Russell Westbrook—Irving’s superior as a player in virtually every respect except isolation scoring—hit this past season, when he averaged a triple-double, led the NBA in both

I’ll be that guy and ask: who cares? I live in an apartment complex in a major US city, so the layout of my apartment is already pretty easy to find online (I literally just typed in my address + floor plans and the schematic layout of every unit in my building was the very first google result). But the fact that the

Exactly. The police took reasonable steps to confirm the identity, and corrected their mistake when it was brought to their attention. What do people on here want? Should the cops spend 10 man hours and thousands of dollars searching FBI and Interpol databases to verify that a shoplifter is who he says he is? He had

Much of this blog post was horribly written, but that sentence was one of the very worst (I’m not sure why everything was “very X” in the article as well. “Very most”, “very greatest”, etc.). You’re misreading it, but I had to reread it a few times myself to get what Burneko was trying to say there.

Y’all spend way too much time noticing and judging what other people are up to.

Why do I get the feeling this whole blog post was just a way for Hamilton to point out that he’s quoted on Super Squats?

Keith’s story sounds much more horrifying to me. Plaster stuck in my braces sounds way better than my own lips and gums being mashed in there.

Thanks. This had nothing to do with anything, but hey, at least you tried.

Where did I say I can laugh at one strangers death? You seem to think emotions are some sort of binary- it’s either on-the-ground-sobbing-sad or it’s not sad at all. That’s absurd. As explained above, it’s perfectly normal to recognize that this is a sad occurrence without also being emotionally devastated by it.

“You and the ninety-one people who starred you are profoundly morally confused.”

“This was a completely predictable and very likely outcome.”

“A swing set is still designed to have an inherent degree of safety. The likely outcome a momentary loss of grip on a swing set is not falling off and hitting hard concrete at speed. They are not comparable except in the minds of the delusional.”

“I save my sympathy for the large portion of humanity that actually deserves it, not the ones who make an informed decision to risk their life for an ephemeral moment of thrill.”

“IMHO that’s a false equivalency to compare race car driving or rock climbing to this.”

“30,000 people a year die on US roads. Is that “sad” too?”

The fact that your comment has 9 stars and the comment you’re responding to has over 100 tells you all you need to know about people on this website. Sure, what she did was ill advised and stupid, but a random person dying is still sad. It’s especially monstrous to see the comments on here considering that this is

“Dress codes (especially arbitrary dress codes) are largely viewed as classist in America”

A) Lawyers that handle these sorts of cases with these sorts of clients aren’t media savvy manipulators. B) A smart lawyer would’ve told the client to keep his mouth shut and let him do the talking. C) He had already pleaded guilty, so controlling the media narrative has nothing to do with the case. Literally nothing