You read this article, didn’t you?

Does foreign policy exist in this game, or did they keep it true to life and not add it?

It isn’t the job of media to be convenient to those they report about.

I think you might be projecting just a little bit there.

At this point, who knows? I’m sure that they feel that their actions were perfectly reasonable. But they’re in a different line of work. My focus is telling the truth about games for readers, whether that’s the external truth that reporters discover or that more internal subjective truth about how a critic feels about…

If you’re pissing people off with your journalism, then you’re doing your job. Ruffling feathers, even if you’re entertainment reporters, is par for the course. Don’t stop doing it just because a couple publishers are a wee bit on the childish side of things.

This is a fantastic article on the complex relationship that exists between the developers of art and the people whose job is to review that art. Well written, well stated, A++++ would Kotaku again.

Definitely agree, “Together We Stand” was the worst, imo. It had no semblance of a story and seemed more like a tech demo or teaser than anything.

Unless they were gonna be on the terrorist team, in which case they’re letting the counter-terrorists win

Now is my time to shine and I got nothing.

“president, founding member, vice-president, treasurer, secretary, and sole member of the...”

Serious question

It’s only shit if your connection is shit. Otherwise it’s perfectly fine.

Nightmare fuel.

Oh man... I’m not too fond of this new colorful fantastical art style.

Or the math for how he figures there were 500 people on Jabba’s sail barge.

Yeah, but will they be localised?