Just cause you suck at Bloodborne doesnt mean its a bad game

How do you best deal with angry internet users when your publisher inevitably fucks up a game through microtransactions or timed exclusives?

He has never stated he is more objective than other people, and has even stated multiple times he believes that it is impossible for him to be without bias. I work the same way (surprise surprise) in that when I judge the quality of a game, I dont want any outside factors affecting my opinion negatively.

Note: I am a huge John TotalBiscuit Bain fan, I have disagreed with him before, but i do sort of have a bias in favor him since he inspired me to be a journalist.

Those arent the bullets, theyre the ammo mags

Im expecting to see some full length movies made in the gta engine at the la film festival this year

so with the value 8766, does the medic's equation hold up? should they have all died within 3 days?

I just finished persona 4 golden, and just started my second playthrough. I NEED THIS SHIT IN AMERICA ON MY VITA. NOW. IF KANJI DOES NOT ATTEMPT TO WOO NAOTO THROUGH INTERPRETIVE DANCE AT SOME POINT IN THIS GAME THEN WHAT IS THE POINT

I remember it being right around its launch so it must have been 2009 then, thanks for pointing that out (no sarcasm) I’ll just super casually update all my posts so i dont look completely dumb

Yeah you have every right to react that way i was pretty incompetent about everything until i hit highschool

maybe i didnt understand how rentals worked because I was a spoiled 10 year old with a pile of credit cards i found?

If they actually make this short movie (which i very much doubt they will) any leftover money they have from the indiegogo could be considered a profit, so its no longer protected, and disney will sue them so hard they’ll have to have another indiegogo campaign titled “keep mickey from throwing us into bankruptcy”

What i meant to say is that Onlive was ahead of its time cause no one had internet speeds fast enough to back it up so it really sucked

I remember trying onlive probably in 2008. I managed to play about 5 minutes of a really bad zombie survival game in 240p before my mother barged into the room asking why i had just charged her card for 12 dollars. I told her i used it for video games and she told me “well atleast we can still return the game” she…

this isnt a concept for a video game...

Okay ive looked at the indiegogo page and im a little less confident about this. Also how the fuck did they expect to get funding for this when they own none of the rights to any of these franchises?

So someone took the ideas of a 12 year old hopped up on pixie stix in the early 2000’s, and decided to ACTUALLY MAKE IT A THING. WE MUST DONATE ALL THE MONIES TO THIS CAUSE. ITS FOR THE CHILDREN I SWEAR IT

i know that a game related to fire emblem being on a sony device is close to impossible, just let me dream

(looks like it’s for the Wii U)

Concerning your comment on the master chief collection, whether or not a game is playable SHOULD determine an opinion on the game. If the game is inherently unplayable because its too buggy, that can mean the game is bad because that means the programmers for the game did a bad job. Battlefield 4 had the same problem…