Well, the name came from her father's family, not her mother's. If she had the name of her mother's family then I'd have said that. And I really only mentioned it because if ownership of the name is the issue then there should be no backlash against her for choosing to take Clooney's name. All last name's were…

Oh, so now I hate black hurricane survivors simply because I pointed out that those who get abortions are not a monolithic population.

Right, cause that's what happened.

No living will, then WHO KNOWS what you could possibly want?!! So fail.

Protesting is more than just holding a sign and chanting. Volunteering and charitable giving are also forms of protest against the status quo. I see tons of people engaging in those kinds of protest in food banks, women's shelters, churches, and homeless shelters all the time. I'm not sure what you're on about.

Certainly I wouldn't want it to be front and center for a child but I find the term "violent" as applied to describing a medical procedure odd.

Actually, it literally does make it her father's family name as opposed to her mother's. Women can change their names to anything they like.

My understanding is that the monarchy signed the bulk of land over with the agreement that it was being perpetually leased. No?

Nope, you're wrong. Functionally, it's a fetus. A parasite is always/ALWAYS of a different species than the host.

The notion that only "the poors" have abortions is one that the pro-choice side needs to disabuse itself of.

Why not, it's just a medical procedure.

I'm lost, is it violent imagery or is it the aftermath of a legal and safe medical procedure.

Read a book. All your "who knows" questions could be answered in about a half hour.

you know they're anti-Semitic to boot.

Wait, your entire argument rests on the reality that fetuses can't talk?

You advocate destruction of property based on ideological differences but condemn extremism in others.

No, medically a fetus is not a parasite unless you believe that a fetus isn't part of the human species.

I'm not sure why you think they aren't or that lots of pro-life and pro-choice people aren't capable of taking up more than one cause at a time.

So you'd prefer she kept her father's name?

Legally, she owns everything in the UK and could dissolve parliament and rule with an iron grip at any time. Legally.