I’d also like to personally apologize to anyone affected. When I uploaded my footage through our system yesterday, I thought it would be cool to show off the new monster and a really fun hunt. I submitted this footage without any idea that something like this was even possible, particularly for something like…

Not intentional and something I’ve spent Saturday morning trying to sort out.

Persona 3 portable for the PSP, Yeah, but that was actually a full redesign of ps3 with every character interaction gender inverted, including the dating sidequests with men instead of women, not merely a DLC that spectacularly crossdressed your lead character.

Friendly reminder that these games are 100% canon.

Why does the promotional art feature characters so heavily clipping through their costumes? Even if that happens in the game you’d think they’d hide it a little in promo material?

Since I’m not familiar with the intricacies of the privacy laws of every nation on earth, no. Can you definitively say that ArenaNet’s actions haven’t violated any nation’s privacy laws?

It’s an invasion of privacy that you allowed.

There’s a lingering question as to whether that would hold up in a court of law, though. Just because something is in a contract doesn’t mean it’s enforceable under scrutiny. TOSes routinely overreach in order to render the company as broadly liability-free as possible. This doesn’t mean that if signers to said TOS…

BeefBroccoli gets it. Honestly, this guy is trying to make it sound like a major invasion of privacy, and frankly no it isn’t. It’s been going on for ages, other game companies have done it before them. And honestly I don’t believe Wosar. Clever cover for people who don’t know how that sort of thing would work, but if…

Whataboutism isn’t going to push forward any point of view.

Doesn’t matter how strong or weak it is, it’s absolutely and completely un-fun to play against -and that’s the first factor taken into account by the OW developers when examining an ability.

ToS are not laws. They can put whatever they want in it. Legal or not.

Nah, it’s more “This produces an unintended experience.” Hanzo is capable of killing tanks suddenly and unexpectedly in a single shot. On heroes like orisa, he can easily out her 400 hp and completely bypass her 900 hp shield instantly. And the only real counterplay involves constantly having your back to your shield.…

A TOS doesn’t magically absolve a company from all legal consequences.

I have a theory about this, actually: maybe the ability that’s set to replace scatter arrow (rapid shot) is supposed to have an eight-second cooldown, and that part somehow made it into the game’s live code

”I am working for an anti-virus company,” he wrote in his post. “I have a ton of tools running that can be used for hacking games. Process Hacker, Cheat Engine, Wireshark, IDA, x64dbg. Was I now banned because I forgot to close all my work stuff after work or because I grabbed my daily reward during lunch break?”

Yeah... Someone who admits they cheat in 2 games but swears they don’t in the 3rd is lying.

If there’s a footprint there’s a good chance it’s a unique one. Footprints are a bit fingerprint like. Everyone wears shoes down differently and even if brand new, that’s a good clue to look at local stores surveillance for a someone like his body build buying the brand of shoe that left the new tread.

That’s why you see if there are any impressions left on the ground by those shoes. That gives you the tread and the size. Every detail you find helps narrow down the possibilities, and then it’s just a matter of identifying the brand of bagging he used, check which stores carry it, and conduct surveillance.

Nearly wrote “Florida Man” about five times while putting this together.