I don’t give a shit about what anyone else thinks- Pikmin is one of my all-time favorite video game series and has never failed to lull me into a sense of zen and calm even as I try to rally all of my little buds before night falls and the creatures eat them. I am as excited for this as I am for the new Zelda or…

This reminds me of when people freaked out at FF12's Gambit system, which allowed you to setup specific commands for your party members that they would automatically execute in battle when the conditions that you assigned were met, like “If [target health] equal or less than 30% > Use Hi-Potion.” They swore it was a…

Seems neat. However I’m more concerned if we get the seamless transition to battle mode like we had in Legends: Arceus. That alone made the game much more enjoyable than any Pokémon in years. They should really just cut down on the battle messages in general. I can tell if it’s raining or there’s a sandstorm.

Fuck. Yes.

This game is going to be so much better than the next one is going to be apparently.

So glad to see that Pokemon GO has finally achieved true parity with the mainline games.

Sorry, but I disagree. The fact you believe men only can be toxic, just for being men, and this woman can’t be toxic, manipulative or violent, just for the fact she is a woman, it’s the worse case of mysoginy.

My dude Italian immigrants experienced racial discrimination from the moment they started coming to the US well into the 20th century

Just to clarify, Pratt is extremely religious, and has credited his church for helping to guide him mentally.

ople complained about Pratt as Mario and Illumination has spent the better part of a year doing damage control and condescendingly telling audiences “SHUT UP WE KNOW WHAT’S GOOD AND YOU DON’T” even though redubbing a voice would cost much, much less than reanimating an entire character.

You missed the point completely congratulations

This isn’t a discussion about how some voice actors are also on screen actors, or vice-versa. The article is trying to draw a distinction between the two types of acting, and the comment is pointing out that the example they used was a horrible one to make their case with because he is, in fact, an “actual” voice…

I’m not a big fan or anything, but the fact that he is headlining the current #1 movie in the world (which just beat a Pixar movie featuring everyone’s first or second favorite Chris) is pretty indicative that this opinion isn’t shared by a majority of the world.

How DARE you not be constantly angry at everything!

I may not agree with some of his decisions in real life, but I do enjoy Chris Pratt movies. And obviously many others feel the same way, since he’s still landing roles.

Count me in with the director who missed the point. Read through the article and can’t find a single articulated reason other than “he attends a homophobic church” which, like, okay? Maybe he’s like most (99.999999999%) christians and isn’t completely involved with their church’s events day to day, or knowledgeable…

Ask 100 random people who this man is and 99 will probably say Chris Evans.

“Far be it from me to criticize Charlie Day for accepting a role as Luigi, but we distinguish between “actors” and “voice actors” for a reason.”

Italian-American here: I don’t give a shit if Chris Pratt is Italian or not, nor if he offends Italians. Who I honestly don’t think give a shit about Mario that much one way or the other, unless my relatives have been keeping this a secret.

Has Pratt actually done anything… bad? Like I feel like Elliot Page just went off on the guy for going to church and a whole bunch of people said ok screw this guy because Elliot said so