For someone who seems to hate Overwatch coverage, you sure do seem to go out of your way to comment on every Overwatch article Kotaku writes...

I would be...only because SE doesn’t have a history with DLC...I mean I am expecting it to include end game stuff...like higher end summons...harder dungeons, skins, ultimate weapons...not stuff that I myself typically care about once I beat a game (I stay for the story and then typically bail). But who knows what SE…

Because DLC is not a game and varies based on the publisher and game...its quite easy to understand.

Uhh...it is 60 dollars worth of enjoyment...because as was said below, everything else was for collectors stuff...which is the entire reason why I made the pre-order buy in the first place. Really don’t know what your hang up is, but then again, in the end, it doesn’t really matter.

Your argument makes no sense. For starters, a game being great is not an indication that DLC will be worth it, therefore pre-ordering one and not the other are not mutually exclusive. Second, I pre-ordered the game out of pure emotional attachment. There was no logical “I know this game will be great” it is more “I…

As a purchaser of the ultimate edition...and re-looking at what is included in it...I am fine with this (and now I can make my own decision about whether the DLC will be worth or it not.)

Maybe you also missed the memo where Kotaku made a pledge to spend the majority of their efforts on games that are already out or other interesting stories, and not acting as a PR machine for upcoming games...

Oh that island...haha...that and drawing Aura all day long to limit break the shit out of everyone.

Draw all day long....

Because some people like to see the world burn...??

It was for sure ironic (I love me Suikoden III and know Jason’s love for Suikoden)...though I appreciate your non-asshole response. You get a STAR :)

Suikoden you say...I have never heard of it...tell me more.....

“I guess I don’t see why all those Overwatch players were banned either for aimbots and triggerbots.”<——- That unfortunately invalidates everything you said prior. Do you like contradicting yourself all in one post?

Oh man...what a sad day...as long as I can keep watching you ESPORTS on Mario Maker Mornings, I can continue...

What is that black armor in your play through video?

CA

Uhh, it doesn’t matter the sex of the person who wrote. I work in HR and Organizational Development. If she gets fired, they will be paying her back wages and damages. You have absolutely no clue what you are talking about.

Your understanding of at will and discrimination is superficial at best. Of course they can fire her without cause, but that doesn’t mean she can’t peruse an EEOC complaint...which she did before she started coming to work in costumes. Her dress was clearly within the boundaries of the original policy, and then they…

“We only see competition between the developer and the customer...we try to only compare our new games against the old ones and not compete with other developers.” For better or worse, its clear they still adhere to this ideology. There is something worthwhile in that.

Retaliation against an employee grievance based on discriminatory dress code policy is okay in your book? It is actually illegal and violates Title VII....you say she was an idiot...her employers are the clear idiots who did not consult a employment attorney before changing the policy.