What a pathetic, spineless, shriveled coward you must be to violently threaten an 12 year old. Especially since all the kid did was use the bloody restroom! I doubt any of the kids care.

Her son. Which was addressed in my comment. I’d like a non-biased party to have some verification. Please try and read all of my comment next time, rather than jumping to comment. 

I’ve read some of Gorka’s thesis. It wouldn’t pass muster in a strong undergrad course in poli sci. I can honestly say, without bragging, that my undergrad thesis was better. So I’m not surprised even Fox doesn’t want him on their more credible shows. Anyone they asked, even the vast majority of conservative leaning…

Aka, you’re completely incapable of any substantive response and are running away after lying.

Given the timing with which she dropped this, I’m inclined to want more evidence to make a determination. I don’t need to see the video. But someone should. Someone other than her, her son, and her lawyer.

Listen, we both know what you are. You’re an utterly worthless troll. You posted this to troll. Everyone knows it. You did not present any thoughts, you’re not “thinking”. You spewed some cliched lies.

Pure and unmitigated horseshit. Neo-Nazis kill people. Antifa makes a mess. There’s no equivalence, and your worthless trolling isn’t fooling anyone. 

Please dismiss the worthless troll “LastCommentOnTheLeft” unless you really feel like we need his shitty Breitbart takes here. 

Oh fuck off. Stop your trolling you mendacious asshat. 

Yes, it did. As for “on the balance”, I’m 99.9% certain you’re not familiar enough with the evidence to made that assertion. This fetish for worshiping the Enlightenment is one of the worst white liberal traits. You whitewash history significantly when doing so.

Stewart is an idiot why give him attention? This just fuels all the false equivalence nonsense where people accuse antifa, who are mostly just a bunch of pissed off teenagers and twenty somethings with a lot of energy and earnestness, of being terrorists.

Yeah, now that I’ve been thrown back into the greys I can use them as teaching moments since I won’t pull them out of the greys myself. That’s the silver lining I’m clinging to hah. 

None of those people can change the way the US throws gobs of money at pointless military expenses (and not enough at necessary military expenses). It’s fait accompli.

I don’t think they are arguing in good faith. I called out one of their posts in the greys which suggested there’s no “charismatic leadership” in the Middle East and that’s why the Arab Spring/Iran protests/Palestinian protests failed. I said that’s not true, because it’s not, and that non-violent leaders are often…

All of those examples have charismatic leaders. They’re simply jailed or sometimes killed by the regimes in power to prevent any such thing from happened. Non-violent activists end up in jail where they can’t organize to prevent threats to the system. 

Both of which had more radical alternatives present in the general debate at the time, which presented enough of a “threat” to make complacency too costly.

False equivalences about “Antifa” is how journalists show they’re “unbiased”. It’s pure horseshit, even if the idiots were wrong to mess with the press. It’s all posturing.

What historical case of non-violence worked without another figure presenting a more radical position? Historically, the most efficient outcomes seem to come from a non-violent movement with a more radical movement on the flanks. 

I’d almost bet money the “taught to punch” part included some really inefficient advice. 

I don’t think these rallies or counter-protests matter. They’re radicalizing online, they’re bringing in new recruits, they’re pushing out their messaging. Some of them are already on the path towards terrorism. The neo-Nazi Atomwaffen division could credibly be called a terrorist group. They organize and radicalize…