Yes, but you don’t start with a compromise number. You start high and then end up at the compromise.

“Do you know how I fuckin know this?”

Also, in California, one of the later primaries where sanders had a lot of steam built, they called the results of the primary for Hillary the night before we voted. The night. Before. We. Voted. If that doesn’t say screw you sanders supporter, don’t even bother voting I don’t know what does. Also, this was when…

Then please explain to me why it was that she beat Sanders in the primaries’ & caucuses’ popular vote by nearly four million votes.

It was horrible. Someone who will never have to live on $12 an hour saying it’s good enough for us.

He also gained popularity as the primaries went on. And his crowd sizes weren’t as important as who was in those crowds: young people of all colors and income levels. Bernie excited the future of the party; Clin-Ton did not. Party leadership that wasn’t governed by their own egos would look at that and take the lesson…

Then you can negotiate to that compromise AFTER you’ve won the office! But when you’re running, at least put out a plan that better reflects the needs of the constituents whose votes you’re supposedly trying to get. Campaign in poetry; govern in prose.

Because a lot of us are sick of her. I wanted her to go away in 2008 after she lost to Obama.  

Excellent idea for compromising. Give up ground before the fight even starts.

The thing was was that the Dems saw those numbers too and decided to go for the kill but did so by aiming at Moderate Republicans who would be too offended by Trump to vote for him. At a certain time, like around the Conventions, that looked like a definite possibility and it’s why Clinton spent time in places like…

I wasn’t assigning blame. I’d be here all day if I were. It’s not like things suddenly became shitty after the 2008 financial crisis. The Reagan years mark the most obvious turning point, but a lot of politicians from both sides of the aisle have helped along the snowballing of income inequality through action and…

Huh. Who knew that treating her presidential campaign like a fucking coronation would turn out to be a bad strategy?

Absolutely! All the more reason for this narcissist to remove herself permanently from the spotlight. The Democratic bench is thin, and that’s because from 2008-2016, Hillary Clin-Ton took up all the light and oxygen that should rightfully have gone to nurturing a new generation of Senators, Rep.s, governors, state…

The more I read about her blaming everyone else for her loss, the more it occurs to me that she would have been only marginally better than Trump. A self involved, alienating eyesore. And before the comments about 45's racism, etc, remember that the Trump administration’s most notable characteristic is really that it…

Her whole campaign pitch was that she was the “most qualified” based on the decades she spent shaping the status quo. How could she be angry at it?

For a woman no longer interested in running for office, she sure has been trying to get in the news to talk about that time she ran for office and how everything went wrong when she lost and wouldn’t you like to see her run again and fix everything WINK WINK.

I can see how hard it might be to get that worked up over an economy that’s working out just fine for you.

Clinton says she hopes to continue being a figure in American politics because “our country’s future is at stake,”

I was more or less happy to vote for Hillary but she needs to go away for the good of the country. All she is right now is a lightning rod for divisiveness at a time when that’s the last thing we need. She drives Democrats apart right when we need to come together, and she makes Republicans so apoplectic they dig in…

As the champion of the status quo, could she have been much angrier at it than she was?