I basically got that you stuck a guy who does not car into a nice car and he thought it was maybe a nice car as did his kid.

TL;DR - Read a different review of the CTS V-sport. This car reviewer doesn’t even own a car.

This is what I got from it: The Cadillac CTS V-Sport is a car.

Tom,

Is there a TL/DR for this?

Different drivetrain requires its own testing.

I have a friend who traded his after six months. He said the fuel economy was rotten and it wasn’t as fun to drive as you’d think. His biggest gripe though: it was a $45,000 car that looked like a $25,000 car. Mind you he’s also owned more Porsches than I have underwear so take his comments with a pinch of salt.

There’s no reason I can see why you would buy this over a Focus RS, unless you’re just a VW fan.

Yeah, if I’m spending $40k it won’t be on a Golf. Or a VW for that matter.

You want, like, a sticker or something?

Cant wait to watch the film, with the japanese sub and subtitiles.

Yeah, I feel like this is a wasted opportunity. It used to be that a stick was the cheap option, but that’s not absolutely necessary. Put a nice manual on the top trim and charge us a premium to pay for development. I would own a 2016 Forester XT if they’d done that.

All according to the Accord accord.

But this isn’t a Ford. Honda uses a different approach to the RevoKnuckle solution than Ford did in the Focus RS. Maybe we should wait to see how Honda’s new dual axis strut front suspension (DASFS), and electronically adjustable damper tech compensates for the torque steer issue. Typically Honda’s performance and…

HEY MAZDA

No way. It looks like a Mustang.

The new Accord coupe.

Gawdzilla...I am proud to say that I am, in fact, the ugly one in the relationship. Isn’t that really always the goal? However, I do have some redeeming qualities...I just can’t think of them right now, I swear.

It is.

FTFY: Avoid anything made by chrysler.