You’re making a lot of assumptions to say it was scratched off though.
Either way its far from a slam dunk case as they’d have to prove that it was scratched off. Also, I’ve never heard a gun with a scratched of SN referred to as a ghost gun.
You’re making a lot of assumptions to say it was scratched off though.
Either way its far from a slam dunk case as they’d have to prove that it was scratched off. Also, I’ve never heard a gun with a scratched of SN referred to as a ghost gun.
You gotta post the “He’s a cop” gif when you do it though.
Why is a ghost gun a slam dunk for felony? They aren’t illegal.
Do you really believe that the people showing up to these events could afford a parcel of land in LA?
Or even a crime related. Getting pulled over for speeding when that was the ONLY crime shouldn’t mean giving up thousands in cash (or more) because you MIGHT use it to smuggle drugs. Thats the issue with asset forfeiture. People doing something stupid af in a car and then having their car seized is NOT the same.
ANYONE WHO DOESN’T SAY THE CHRYSLER CORDOBA IS WRONG!!!
Maybe they have... but dual airbags weren’t even required until 1999...
Side curtain airbags weren’t required until 2014, and there are exceptions to that.
What you’re seeing now is airbags in the a-pillar... They increase the amount of space the pillar takes... its dumb.
I have spent quite a bit of time in a lot of major cities, including Boston, NYC, Miami, multiple parts of LA, Philly, Las Vegas and Phoenix...
Speaking as someone with aspergers, who is prone to sudden fits of sensory overload... I have NEVER come across a place that is as constantly loud as NYC. I have never been an…
But then they go and stick airbags in them all so it eliminates the vision savings.
You lost me at Ghibli... its nothing like a dart... zero percent like a dart. Different platform, different motors, different everything unless you are just counting window switches...
Idk man, Durangos are still prety spectacular... probably going away, but still better than the Jeeps.
It was Ford, on the f-150. Because the government made a change in the middle of a product cycle that wasn’t easily addressed. Not ok that they did it on only crew cabs, but it wasn’t heavy duty vs light duty, it was crew cab vs super cab and regular cab.
Because that isn’t how manufacturing works. Especially if you go back to ram from 10-18... the cabs are literally the same cab on 1500/2500/3500.
And this is exactly why Ford shouldn’t be having to pay out 1.7B in that lawsuit.
Its california... they only spend money to cater to a bunch of selfish fucking criminals... Its like the state motto....
But your cost of living takes away the wage benefits, and its a disgusting, crime riddled area full of entitled assholes who are angry. Plus the noise there is constant and annoying.
Lets just call it like it actually is... the bank doesn’t want to loan to poor people. Regressive policies are regressive.
Ok, I understand the point of punitive damage...NHTSA crash tests, they allowed this to be on the road... Why is Ford responsible for 1.7B for people who had a tire blowout, when their truck met the standards for the time. How far back is too far back? If I wreck a 68 Camaro convertible, can I go after GM because it…
Ok, I understand the point of punitive damage...NHTSA crash tests, they allowed this to be on the road... Why is Ford responsible for 1.7B for people who had a tire blowout, when their truck met the standards for the time. How far back is too far back? If I wreck a 68 Camaro convertible, can I go after GM because it…
1.7 Billion is an ABSURD amount no matter what though. Lets be clear here.