God I LOVED that line. She wanted to get under his skin and saying “he choked” was going to do that.

Before the first debate there was a discussion between my (male) coworkers where one stated that she might not do well in the debate because of her temper, and the other asked (something like)“Why? Does she get crazy like a woman?” and that was the day I learned I could never get angry at work. Angry women are crazy,…

oh my god, she’s like a living breathing Jim Halpert.

I watched the debate with my husband, whose criticism of Hillary’s performance was that she wasn’t aggressive enough. I tried to explain to him that as the first woman to get to this level in American politics, she’s walking a tightrope between looking too ‘soft’ and being labeled a bitch for being too aggressive. As…

Is he a friggin cartoon character? Are those even real facial expressions?

Also, if this thing were rigged he’d never have become the nominee.

Remember how many of us were like, “I hope Obama doesn’t get assassinated during his inaugeration.” Well, I wish I could say I am not thinking the same about Clinton. 

There wasn’t a single eye roll, smirk, or cocked eyebrow.

I loved when the debate was over and Clinton just peacocked across the stage directly in front of Trump with a big victorious smile on her face while he was still seething at his podium.

Hillary is best and most “natural” when assertively going after absolute buffoonery. I like her more as an aggressive Hermione than someone attempting to be motherly/likeable/“one of us.”

I am so fucking ready to see this woman get her Inauguration Day.

i assume that during every debate Hillary is thinking to herself “I can’t believe I have to do this wtfff” 

A foreign government hacked a major political party’s e-mails, faked ones to make it look bad, and fed them to Assange to release. He’s not a champion of truth and transparency. He’s Putin’s stooge.

I’ve been a supporter of non-profit journalistic Wikileaks from day one. OK.

Right, but the releasing of secrets was entirely one-sided. Blocking an attack on one side (or, rather, ceasing to enable that attack by giving Assange free rein) actually restores neutrality and fair play.

Unfortunately, one involves another country feeding Assange documents, at least one of which was altered/created. Wikileaks and Assange have already proven they don’t care about the contents, so it’s not like theyre going to check for tampering before they release anything.

Yeah, screw Komen. I’ve gone out of my way not to give them a dime since the Great Planned Parenthood Fuckup.

I see the parsimonious approach you’re taking. Non-profits are hugely about image and reputation. If progressive orgs are still doing business with the douche then there’s guilt by association; and when you’re trying to fundraise that kind of publicity isn’t good

They’re not, it’s your sentiment that the election is a done deal. It’s the most dangerous kind of sentiment. People start sharing that sentiment, start believing trump cant win, then theyre getting off work on election day and decide theyre too tired to vote, and it doesnt really matter since trump was never going to…