I and many others are pretty sure her entire budget was spent on hiring people to make these twitter accounts to harrass herself. It is the only logical conclusion and also HIGHLY unethical...

So long as the industry is what it is we will continue to shine our beacon of Ethics into the darkness of Colluded Game Journo Pros.

You have to understand that it is TRULY about Ethics in Games Journalism. I don't know why myself, and many in my movement must constantly stress this. It begins and ends with Ethics.

Schafer is a known Ess Jay Double-yew and has thrown his lot in with Anita and other Ethics hating people, so that would explain his behavior on Twitter. I would personally recommend boycotting the game until he falls in line with the demands of my movement, but you are free to collude with enemies at your discretion.

Do not be so sure of yourself, young Jason, for our reach is long and our Ethics are strong.

Politics and opinions have no place in a publication about games. It is highly unethical to do so, but when was the last time that Game Journo Pros cared about Ethics? Myself and many in my movement attest that they never have.

The quotes and tone of the article compared to the others IS suspicion raising. Do we have a case of Unethical Collusion on our hands? It's possible, but too early to tell. We will be monitoring this...

It is well know that Joystiq and many other Game Journo Pro websites are little more than hives of Ess Jay Double-yew scum and villany. Normally, human beings are not happy when people just wanting to earn a living are fired, but myself and many in my Movement are not normal human beings, for we are fueled by the…

I am beginning to wonder, is it possible we have a case of collusion on our hands? Perhaps some sacks of cash with Bungie's logo has landed upon a Game Journo Pro's desk at Kotaku HQ?

As with any discussion about doxxing I feel like I should take or upon myself to clear up a few things about my Movement (to which I totally belong) that some people might not understand.

Such is the nature of the Free Market we want: the consumers decide what they will pay for, and the market will adjust and provide accordingly. If consumers DON'T want buggy scams, they would not purchase buggy scams. Clearly there is a market for it and the Invisible Hand moves accordingly

I make no jokes, good sir, this is a deadly serious matter. Please see my post further down in the greys for more Ethical clarification.

Steam IS a Monopoly and they broke SEVERAL anti-trust laws and got away with it. See: the entire Hatred debacle.

Ethics must ALWAYS be the highest of standards.

It is well known by myself and many others within my movement, to which I totally belong, that Steam is an Unethical Monopoly that has broken many anti-trust laws, especially during the Hatred debacle.

References to "the West?" Concern for other cultures? I hate to make accusations like this until they come from a confirmed, trusted source, but you sound like an Ess Jay Double-yew rather than a Real Core Gamer.

I would just like to again state, for the record, that there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever to suggest that video games, or the interactions within, can effect a human's behavior in any way, shape or form.

Because we CAN! This is Censorship! Capital Censorship of the highest order! Steam, as an essential monopoly, has an Ethical obligation to provide an uncensored and unrestricted platform for ALL speech!

Indeed this is the best they can do, and "Their Kind" would indeed blame our glorious consumer movement for 9/11 of these free speech hating Ess Jay Double-yews thought they could get away with it. That's just the type of person that they are.

Do you have any PROOF in these wild accusations of yours, sir, or is this more Ess Jay Double-yew free speech hating rhetoric?