Haven't heard anything concrete, but I'll just go ahead and say Guy Gardner is firmly on Chappelle's side.

I didn’t think any of the Green Lanterns were, but I can’t be sure.

I’m kinda with you. Back in the day, before porn was two clicks away and before everyone knew everyone else regularly used it, seeing Natasha Kinski in Cat People or whatever had its purpose.  Nowadays, I can see that and much, much, MUCH more any time I choose.

It really is worth noting that, even though it was clearly breaking news and not all the information was available at the time, the coverage on Thursday night seemed to be akin to, “Alec Baldwin shoots woman on set of film” with his face plastered on every news outlet. No indication of whether or not it was a horrible…

Aside from the fact that I’m a weirdo who finds most sex scenes in movies tedious and unnecessary filler, I’m really not really even sure what they could accomplish under the PG-13 rating anyway. So it seems potentially extra pointless. I'm going to give her the benefit of the doubt, I guess, but I've always assumed…

This is fucking tragic, but it’s gross how some folks like EB here want to use this to wildly speculate that Alec Baldwin “did this.” 

It sounds about as criminal for someone as the train accident a few years back.

“I was trying to take the nail OUT! I was trying to help The Man!”

If any part of you is “grinning,” I think you’re the complete asshole in this situation.

If the alt-right had any ideological consistency at all, they’d be defending Baldwin for exercising his Second Amendment rights and digging up dirt on Halyna Hutchins and Joel Souza to try to make it look like they were either at fault or deserved what they got.

They’re from different worlds.

The comments aren’t “broken”. Every time you click “Load more comments” hunting for the comment you made that someone replied to, it generates a page impression. You really think that’s not yet another “brilliant” Jim Spanfeller idea?

Because the corporation that has the power to censor the thing you hate, has the power to censor the thing you love.

“When they do it it’s bad but when we do it it’s good” doesn’t mean it’s not censorship. Netflix doesn’t have a legal obligation. But it has a moral one. Philosophically, we didn’t create these limitations on government power because “well it’s bad when the government uses its powers like this, but it’s good when any…

“Also, why is Falcon and the Winter Soldier so boring?”

But that’s what people loved about Civil War. The big CGI battle happened in the middle, and the final fight was two estranged friends absolutely beating the shit out of each other while talking about their feelings.

“And why does McDonald’s insist on serving burgers? Why can’t they do something different for once?!”

I said in some other thread the other day that it’s like people going to a Star Wars movie and complaining that there are stars and wars.  It’s the nature of the franchise - if someone doesn’t like it that can be valid, but that’s just plain how it works.

Yeah, I see that happening with a lot of Marvel movies/TV shows. There’s this refrain of, “and then there’s a big CGI battle at the end, which is so boring, there’s always a big battle in the third act, why do they keep doing the same thing?”
Uh, because that’s what happens in the third act of an action movie? Like,…