She looks like she just realized that a black woman, who overcame abuse, racism, misogyny and extreme poverty to become a self made billionaire has a far better chance of becoming the first woman president than her, and there’s nothing she or daddy’s money can do about it. Suck it bitch! I’d hate to have been the…

No, they’re trying to undermine the credibility of the dossier, make sure that he’ll be too afraid to come to America to be interviewed or offer testimony, and muddy the waters in advance of the completion of Mueller’s investigation. Basically just more standard run of the mill water carrying for Trump and party over…

Lol, no need to defend him because NOBODY’S MADE AN ISSUE OF IT.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/03/02/us/mike-pence-used-private-email-as-governor-news-report-says.html?referer=https://www.google.com/

I know, I’ve seen Footloose! 😂

The “who’s having a good time, and how can I put a stop to it” party!

Ugghhhh, I have no doubt you’re right about that.

Oh no! So, we’re never gonna get to the bottom of this awful scandal where 3 million illegals voted for Clinton, fraudulently denying Trump his popular vote victory? Sad. 

Lol, don’t nobody wanna see that mess! Melania only endures her bi-monthly wifely duties with eye covers, Valium and Ambien

He’s not our real dad!!

Oh he’s a true Florida mastermind all right. Not saying anybody should ever kill their wife, BUT, if you do, maybe wait till after she’s dead before you change your FB status to “widowed”?

Hey, you leave Sassy out of it. SHE DIDN’T CHOOSE TO BE A PART OF ALL THIS

Meghan’s family when they come to visit

I know you’re talking black folks, but who’sthe other? Single women or millenials (could actually be both as there’s crossover)?

Also, nearly 70% of white voters in Alabama STILL voted for a pedophile, so the moral high ground may have its limitations?

Incorrect. A necessary element for sexual harassment, as a matter of law, is that it be unwelcome. If it’s welcomed than it’s just sex.

I think you’re replying to someone else? We were talking about Clinton, and agreed (I thought?) that it was an ethical, as opposed to legal (there was no official White House policy relating to interoffice) or criminal, breach. But yes, if he’d touched her without her consent it would’ve been criminal.

Sexual harassment isn’t criminal. Criminality would require unwanted touching, in which case it would be a sexual battery

Gotcha. So you’re using “harassment” and “victim” more in the ethical and moral sense as opposed to the legal sense. In that case yes, most people would probably agree that Clinton should have rebuffed Monica’s advances.