It’s how censorship begins. The left is frequently as susceptible to authoritarian tendencies as the right - “some animals are more equal than other animals” and all that
Mass might also be using the threat of withholding casino approval as leverage over the Board to try to force them to fire Wynn
Haha, I’m an attorney as well and can’t ever seem to get seated on jury either! Agree to disagree on this one counselor
I pray you’re never on a jury where I’m a defendant
Ken Starr was so desperate to nail Bill that he ended his 70 million dollar, 7 yr Crusade with a consensual affair with an adult intern. If there was even an iota of credibility to her claim he would’ve used her. Not because he cares about women, he doesn’t. Starr is a piece of shit, and the rape scandal at Baylor…
Lol, misogynistic hipsters are passing around pabst blue ribbons in their minority free gentrified neighborhoods as they reminisce about how great Jack Kennedy was...dude, he shared Marilyn Monroe with his BROTHER! Epic bro!
The difference from Ivana though is the incentive to lie. Ivana presumably wouldn’t want to falsely accuse the father of her children of rape, especially when she was trying to arrive at a divorce settlement with a notoriously vindictive litigant like Trump. Broadrick, on the other hand was on the GOP payroll, and is…
Yes, he was inappropriate with Paula Jones, no debate there. And he paid dearly, as he should have. The assault claims, however, are dubious to say the least. I actually feel sorry for Broadrick though, especially when I see her defending Trump and attacking Trump’s accusers. She’s been exploited and manipulated by…
I guess if you disregard Broadrick’s sworn testimony....
There’s a tort in the “defamation family” called portrayal in false light, which would likely provide a cause of action. Like defamation, when it comes to celebs, it requires “actual malice”, and must be likely to cause embarrassment.
Franco’s accused of rape?
I can’t use who owns or funds a media company as a FACTOR in assessing whether there’s an agenda? Really? So you don’t think ppl are justified in giving Fox News stories a heightened level of skepticism? How about RT? You must have missed the most recent election! In any event, I was just speculating abt the Jezebel…
Perhaps it’s because they’ve discovered that the publication, “Babe” (great name), was funded by News Corp? As in Rupert “Goebbels” Murdoch’s News Corp...
Lot to unpack here. Obviously there’s some unrelated, preexisting animus toward this guy, so I’m assuming this is hyperbole. I hope you’re not suggesting that he’s an actual Harvey Weinstein type sex offender, or advocating for a physical assault on him.