futurepixels
futurepixels
futurepixels

Really? Where is the Silicon Valley area in GTA V? And they could always do the North Bay instead.

No, more futuristic. GTA II was set anywhere between 1999 and 2013, and wasn't all that futuristic.

I definitely liked the commentary, especially on social media and the cloud, but I didn't pick up that Rockstar was trying to "say something" with the story. If they were, the message wasn't very clear.

To be fair, Rockstar hasn't made any games in a futuristic setting, right? I mean, I wouldn't count State of Emergency.

But we have no idea what to expect from actual gameplay, and it might not even come to consoles! Cue whynotboth.gif.

Right! Unfortunately, the possibility is based on Rockstar "having something to say" with a futuristic setting. Apparently, this means they were saying something with GTA V's story...:

I want a GTA set in a future Bay Area (SF, Oakland, Silicon Valley). Cyberpunk GTA! Flying cars! Basically, GTA x Fifth Element x Bay Area. Multi-passes optional.

I'm bummed I didn't get the survey, but as always, the answer is simply "DINOSAURS!!!!", regardless of the question asked.

This! I've put 50 hours into Dragon Age and 8 into Far Cry 4, but I have the same problem with both of them. There is so much that feels like filler in these worlds, while it doesn't seem like there is enough pay off from the story and experience to justify the time. I keep meaning to go back to them, but I'm

That is a weak argument. The fact that mass amounts of people like something doesn't make it good. A lot of people eat at McDonald's and like it, but the food is still garbage.

This is literally one of the stupidest things I have ever seen someone post on the internet.

It was more than just a graphics upgrade.

Hopefully, the same thing happens to you the next time you make a typo, and in that case, maybe it will actually matter.

People can have opinions, but that doesn't mean everyone has to like them, and having an opinion doesn't preclude someone from being called out for having bad taste. The list sucks.

There is room for both if we get rid of some of the other crap on this list.

The best action game of all time deserved to beat out most of the other games on this list, though. It simply doesn't make any sense.

It's simply more fun.

This list has made me loose respect for the Kotaku staff a bit. Everyone has already chimed in on the disappointments, but seriously, Destiny, Threes, and wait, Rusty's Real Deal Whatever and no Mario Kart, Bayonetta, or GTAV?