fugeesnfunions
fugeesnfunions
fugeesnfunions

First of all, the resolution is 1024x600, not 1024x768 - whoever put this spec sheet together got it wrong. Second of all, it does have a dual core processor, but it doesn't perform anywhere near the level of the processors found in more expensive tablets.

I have an iPad 2 and iPhone 4 and use Skype all the time. How exactly is it not "all that easy" to put something on a stand?

I'm a little confused.. Our Yamaha Waverunner FX SHO and FX Cruiser SHO have 1.8L 1812cc supercharged engines, and we bought them last year. These engines aren't new.

As someone who's always been surrounded by PWC's and boats, is still growing up, and just got back from a week at the lake on my families houseboat, I'm having a hard time not laughing at your comment.

Sans a couple days, the iPhone has been the best selling phone on Verizon since it's introduction. Only the iPhone 4 could release on a network, nearly a full year since it's initial introduction, and have people clamoring for it.

And how many startups make it to the level Apple is currently at? Take your average tech startup, follow their income, and see how long it would take for them to pay the same as Apple does in taxes.

Windows 7 is doing well, but Windows Phone 7 isn't doing anything close to decent.

If my $19 JVC Marshmallow inear headphones can silence my Harley's rumbling engine plus the accompanying wind-roar at freeway speeds, and as I found out this past weekend, the engine of my supercharged waverunner and 350 hp boat, I have a hard time imagining they wouldn't be able to muffle the sounds of New York's

I like to think that one the most vital services we, the starred commenters, are responsible for, even more so than leaving top-tier comments, is filtering out/hiding comments like the one Leon Si decided to deposit here.

I get it, I really do. Big corporations are evil blood-sucking vampires that step on the common man and use new born puppies for skeet shooting practice. Then there's Apple, which some of you consider the shining symbol of pretentious douchary that wouldn't know an original idea if it hit their $700 wool knit cap and

The other, more important, question is: how many centuries would it take for some no-name startup to pay into California's tax system in a year, what Apple pays in a financial quarter? Personally, I think several dozen.

I don't know if my analysis holds any water, I'm just so desperate for the next iPhone to be a big upgrade after waiting so long for it to come out, that I'm coming up with every excuse under the sun to discredit the numerous leaks of supposed 4[S] parts.

I'm not going to keep on arguing back and forth, but I feel like I have to point out a couple different things:

Sorry.. but that's just blatantly WRONG. Apple regularly replaces broken phones for faaar less than the retail cost.

That's the only thing I could think of that made any sense. Would the letters on the A5 chip be reversed if the picture was mirrored/reversed?

While your observation might have merit, I'm fairly certain the fact that HP couldn't actually sell the devices those employees were tasked to create had far more to do with WebOS's inability to reach profitability.

Just want to say that I regret the tone and wording of my response. I came off somewhat hostile and very disrespectful. Please disregard it as inane ramblings from someone taking out their bad day on yourself.

That comment was made before the second picture was added, it's in reference to the original picture that was included in the post.

My comment was in direct reference to the original picture, not the second picture they added later.

Not sure if anyone else has noticed this, but the front camera lens is on the wrong side. If that's the back of the front cover, then the lens would be on the right side of the speaker when flipped over. The front camera lens on the iPhone 4 is on the left side of the speaker grill.