“The drivers seemed to be ambivalent, while the teams probably hate it because it risks yet more damage...”

I swear this happens every damn time Springfield gives away a boat to a local yahoo

Putting the deposit down now. Sure, mock me. But when the rising sea levels turn your apartments into human aquariums I’ll be hanging out with Kevin Costner and Mr. Limpet on the open seas enjoying a nice plate of fish with a side of fish fries and a tall glass of fish juice. SEA ya!

Why don’t you spend your energy focusing on the substantive errors in Blackstock’s reporting, and less on the grammatical errors of the commentariat. I write on a cell phone, don’t get paid to do this, and no one other than you gives two craps about my responses having spelling errors. Get a grip.

Ferrari are pissed because Stroll busted their engine from his crash into Leclerc. Now Ferrari facing its own potential grid penalty based on the engine replacement.  That seems ... less than fair.

They all should have thought of this before agreeing to the caps. With that said, I think a vote will be forthcoming in next off season that grants relief to constructors whose vehicles were damaged based on different factors.

Read the paragraph again. Whose on first, Laurel or Hardy? Fine, Hamilton. Not that the paragraph itself or the paragraph preceding made that clear. But what about 5th?

Say what now?

This wasn't intentional,  of course,  but Merc is responsible for 2 DNF and up to a 10 grid deficit to Verstappen today, just in past 2 races. At some point you say these penalties are too lenient compared to what other teams have lost. 

Watch out, F1. If you’re not careful the WWE is going to sue you for copyright for stealing one of their storylines.

The “new” “evidence” was making Albon play pretend grown-up racer and recreate Hamilton’s line with a 2 year old chassis-engine

... and Hamilton and Toto would feign disgust if Hami got punted. The sport is 50% racing and 50% “on the next Drive to Survive...”

Thats all fine but none of thus gamesmanship should change one’s opinion on fault here. Whether Horner is a whiny brat may change who you like or root for, but has shite to do with whether Hamilton and Merc got off too easy.

Agreed. I think Toto just wants to make sure that when the inevitable announcement comes that Russel is taking the seat from Bottas that Bottas doesn’t pull a “give no fucks” move like when Vettel got his walking papers from Ferrari.

Disagree. This is just shit politicking which Horner and Wolf both do as a professional side-show to the main event. Once lights out the racers are going to race. Verstappen was aggressive before and will be aggressive after, but he knows another DNF is the biggest risk to his title challenge. And RB probably believe…

“Horner said that the crash cost Red Bull $1.8 million, an amount that, “has massive ramifications in the budget cap era,” which is probably true. Still, every time Red Bull talks about the crash, it makes me more and more certain that Verstappen had some culpability...”

Subscribers to Tushy.com beg to differ.

Thats going to be part of the team biathlon. One teammate rides their road bike in traffic trying to avoid cars while the teammate is in car traffic shooting at the other bike riders. Bonus points if the driver can run over the other country’s riders. Riders get bonus points if they can break car mirrors. Or maybe…

Agree completely. Last time I checked Pirelli is not a constructor so why are their tires such a big part of the equation for qualifying? Race strategy is one thing but the artificial importance placed on tire selection in qualifying and how it impacts which tire a team can use to start a race is really just a weak…