This is basically destruction of property.”

The ending of The Last of Us still getting way too much credit despite everything it’s creator and sequel have done to undermine it’s supposed ambiguity 

Joel was right. 

When i first played the game on PS3 and got to this point i just didn’t believe the firefly’s about there being a cure to begin with. What exactly is it that the they need to remove from Ellie body that would result in her death that is needed to make a cure? my personal take was they were so damn desperate and still…

Naw. The entire lynch pin for the second game is “Death of Random Henchman #2 actually matters!” which is undermined by the insane level of violence you end up engaging in along the way.

The real solution to that of course was to tell a story with completely new characters in the world and in the same vein in terms of attempts at prestige storytelling. Further exploring Joel and Ellie’s story forces answers to questions that were best left to be pondered. Also just, yeah, a part of what made TLOU so…

The ending to TLOU is fantastic, but the setup to the ending is terrible. It’s really where this game stumbled. Because Joel’s reaction is absolutely something that is meant to be seen as dooming the world, but also as something absolutely reasonable—a father saving his daughter. The problem is that really horrible…

This is the worst take on video games I’ve heard in a long time- and there’s a lot of bad takes. Well done.

This is just about the dumbest thing to complain about this game for.

So you’re saying this video game treats animal rescue more like a fun activity in a video game than a difficult responsibility in real life? Interesting.

I understand where you’re coming from and I completely agree about our methods to catch those beasts can be somewhat violent, but I think you need to look from a bigger perspective when we’re talking about the workflow of this “animal rescue”. I highly recommend to watch the fantastic beasts, Newt is doing the same…

At this point you’re just looking for any reason to hate. What next, the character should get winded after running? Or what? The ghosts are cultural appriopriation?

You are judging it by 2023 standards in a game that takes place in the late 1800s. I mean the British at the time thought that conserving nature was mounting the head of the animal on your wall.

Those signs aren’t for the kids skating. It’s for the parents who will inevitably sue the property owner after their kid needs a few stitches.  

No, we should have bicycle lanes.

Or we could process and package the homeless to feed the hungry.

These are good things. Most people don’t want kids spreading wax over every surface and crashing into people on their boards when they bail out of a grind

Shout out to Harry Potter winning Favorite Book Series at the Nickelodian Kids’ Choice Awards. I guess it’s not that controversial after all.

1. I agree with you as to the result of releasing this game in its current state. Won’t argue with you there. It leads to some of the awkward stuff you’ve articulated really well.

2.  I’m sure you’ve thought of this (qualifying because I don’t want to come off mansplainy), but if I had to guess, don’t think it’s…

>“Goblins, frustrated with being considered lesser-than, have taken to violence to gain equality, and in our society, that’s a no-no).”