How is this relevant to any of the points I’ve made? Or are you just rage spamming now because you’ve run out of anything resembling a real argument to make?
How is this relevant to any of the points I’ve made? Or are you just rage spamming now because you’ve run out of anything resembling a real argument to make?
“when she said Drejka confronted her”
Confronted, not threatened.
Yes, you quoted me and the quotes did not say what you claim they said.
1. You are a liar. I never tried to justify the murder and in fact I specifically stated more than once that it was not justified.
Now you are attempting to move the goal post. You said previously he was not yelling at her, now after being disproved with the facts of the case you say his behavior was not threatening.
Yeah, fuck facts and the people who care about them.
Yep, the word of an immigration attorney on this very article clearly isn’t enough.
I’m not a child.
Yeah ok, you can fuck off now.
Wow, you really are an idiot, since you already agreed that that statement was wrong, more than once.
God damn I didn’t think you could get any dumber, but here we are.
You are an idiot. Glad we are on the same page.
My point has always been that your statement is incorrect.
Well shit, had I known you were arguing that the person that was murdered didn’t have a right to shove another person, then I wouldn’t have bothered responding to your very obvious and very pointless position.
All I’ve read from you is an excuse for why that killing wasn’t murder.
It means you are taking my argument and turning it into something else. You keep putting words in my mouth that I didn’t say or even imply.
As I’ve said multiple times, the victim did not deserve to be shot. He doesn’t have to have acted perfectly for that to be true. Equality of actions is not required for anything…
I keep saying he wasn’t threatening because looking at the video, he’s two feet away from the car. Was he yelling at her, absolutely. Just being loud and rude to someone isn’t threatening. The victim did not have the right to defend anyone with physical violence because of yelling or screaming. That doesn’t mean I…
Don’t act like there wasn’t bad actions on both parts, asshole. I never said anything about being equal, that’s your need to make a straw man yet again, because you don’t want to confront reality.
You said
Are you claiming that someone being verbal gives another person the right to defend another person PHYSICALLY?
I’m certainly not trying to justify that a man was killed but he absolutely had NO right to become physically violent. He didn’t deserve to be killed, he deserved an assault charge.
You are insane if you can’t see the bad action on both sides of this.
The woman was not being accosted. She was being spoken to, certainly disrespectfully (which she deserved BTW) from a distance of 2 feet away.
Walking out of the store and immediately reacting to that by shoving someone hard onto the ground is…