Ok, that is an amazing reference.

Holding a march isn’t suppressing dissent to their beliefs. Anyone who dissents is perfectly capable of holding a counter demonstration, which pretty much always happens.

You’re questions are being addressed, but you pretend otherwise to avoid having to actually address the arguments made. Because you can’t.

Stop avoiding he actual topic you intellectually dishonest coward.

“Oh I said the part in quotes but it wasn’t attributed to any particular subject.”

A reminder for the illiterate.  

It’s literally every statute ever that prohibits shooting someone except under (X) circumstances, none of which include a person’s race.

You just just can’t read or make any kind of argument that isn’t purposefully obtuse.

LITERALLY ANYTHING YOU AGREE WITH.

It’s not just some “imagined scenario” it’s the very heart of the matter that you are afraid to engage with.

I mean, just look at how eager YOU are to suppress speech, just because YOU don’t like it.

When you allow for the suppression of speech, it opens up the door to the suppression of speech you agree with. It’s a dangerous precedent.

When you allow for the suppression of speech, it opens up the door to the suppression of speech you agree with. It’s a dangerous precedent.

That is a fact and you won’t engage with it because you cannot make any logical argument against it.

Bullshit. The post you responded to explicitly mentioned it. The question you’ve worked hard all day avoiding directly addresses it.

YOU are talking about pedantic dumb shit, everyone ELSE IS talking about freedom of speech.

Why are you asking stupid childish questions in a discussion about free speech?

Someone tried to engage you in the serious topic of the danger of regulating opinions. Your response was to pedantically argue what an opinion is. It’s how you approach every “discussion” you have. You are clearly afraid to engage with serious topics in any meaningful way.

Yeah, it is wanting to regulate opinions. You know it true too, that’s why you have to hide the evidence.

Sure. That doesn’t counter what was said.

You know, you’ve been going on about this for four days too, right?

You are no different.

It does make sense, you are just being a pedant again.

People who want to regulate marches, DO want to regulate opinions.

Trying to “win” with this kind of nonsense just makes you look like an ass. You clearly don’t want to engage with the subject in any meaningful way. I don’t think you’re capable.  

Yes, they do really believe that. The levels of stupid from some people are simply mind blowing.

I’m pretty blown away by how stupid the characters were in this episode.