Well, that’s about what I thought. People just like to throw that word at people that disagree with them.

Having seen them in a previous discussion, I can say that isn’s true. Do you have any specific examples?

I’ve seen them around before. You you really think they disagree with people, “as a rule”? As in, it’s not something they actualy disagree with, they are just saying it to disagree?

Because unless they really are saying things they don’t even agree with just to fight and not actually have a reasonable discussion about…

I’ve noticed that he tends to keep it up until the inevitable next nonsensical argument stream comes along and then he drops it for the new one. Making sure to dismiss the thread so he gets the last word and no one can see how silly he was acting.

He’s doing this with someone, often more than one, every single day.…

Yes, that would be the word people don’t seem to understand the real meaning of. They toss it at anyone who says something they don’t like. That’s not what it means.

I’m not sure anyone who uses that term actually knows what it means anymore.

I have to say, declaring that you were still arguing after you responded with “agreed” is comedy gold.

That slavery is always wrong is a subjective opinion that I agree with 100%.

What my opinion is on something is different than it’s objective reality.

I can have the subjective opinion that something is always wrong without that being objectively true.

Perhaps you need to familiarize yourself with the concepts a bit more.

The fact that objective morality doesn’t exist doesn’t allow for slavery to be situationally morally right.

I do not think slavery is ever right, in any situation.

You don’t need an objective source for morality to think something is always wrong.

Again, if objective morality exists, what is your objective source?

I think slavery is morally wrong.

I also recognize that objective morality doesn’t exist. What is so terrible about that?

If objective morality exists, what it your objective source for it?

I think slavery is logically and morally wrong.

I also recognize that objective morality doesn’t exist. What is so terrible about that?

If objective morality exists, what it your objective source for it?

The system didn’t fail me at all. I have critical thinking skills and the ability to form a coherent and logical argument, and not rely on fallacies dishonesty.

The system didn’t fail me at all. I have critical thinking skills and the ability to form a coherent and logical argument, and not rely on fallacies dishonesty.

I’m not the one with poor reading comprehension skills in this conversation. They are saying that they teach slavery is bad for slaves.

It’s not a disrespect or equivocation for what’s as close to an objectively, factually morally reprehensible system as you can think of. It’s an attempt to create a deeper understanding than having a kid parrot back “Slavery Bad”. Hopefully, having thought about it and come to the conclusion themselves, it will…

They are saying that they teach slavery is bad for slaves. You just don’t want to listen.

Exactly how are these teachers bad teachers for teaching slavery is bad using methods that develop critical thinking skills and increase retention of information?

You KNOW I’m right, that’s why you keep dismissing everything, you…

Seems unfair to count mosquitoes since it’s not technically the mosquito that kills but the parasite.

People who were told and did nothing should be arrested for aiding and abetting. Their failure to act is completely unacceptable.

They ARE being taught slavery is bad for slaves, you just won’t listen to everyone telling you that.

They are teaching it in a way that is more complex than just telling someone a fact. Because doing it that way builds critical thinking skills and increases retention of the information.

How are you opposed to critical…