Her name is stated at the 11:11 mark of the video

Whiggly has been identified as an anti-black troll by another member (who provided textual evidence).

Bending over backwards to paint white men as heroes goes as far back as the commemorations of our genocidal, rapists, slave-owning ‘founding fathers’.

...it’s hard to imagine that this lawsuit doesn’t make some sweeping changes in the auto industry—no one should endure this kind of treatment on the job.

With all that in mind, Mallory is expected to denounce a group that gave her charity when she was a teenager but adults that voluntarily entered into unions can’t be asked to account for what their partners do?

[& While I think its misguided not to condemn Farrakhan’s antisemitism more forcefully, Mallory stated that the Tablet report was not truthful, so I’m basing my opinion on what she has said on Palestinian liberation/Israel’s despicable apartheid system—assuming the puppet-master remarks are disputable].

Condemning the apartheid state of Israel is not antisemitic. Nazis do not care about Palestinian liberation so the idea of denouncing the clear human right violations attendant to enduring land grabs and refusal of right to return cannot even logically be deemed Nazism (nice try with the subterfuge to relabel a…

I said marriage precludes“ ‘absolute’ guilt by association” because the person you marry may turn out to be different than what you expected (most ppl don’t marry someone they think is going to cheat on them by harassing other women). And, the part you ignored, Hillary was still challenged for her husbands actions and…

A certain privilege comes when you are married to someone, that in turn absolves you of having absolute guilt by association. Furthermore, Hillary DID face accusations of hypocrisy (mostly from the right) off of Bill’s actions.

Re: Tamika Mallory:

I watched the video ( https://blackjunction.tv/watch/Z1TaxlGc2SxJdrz ) and Nick Conrad employs an overtly allegorical method to critique both contemporary and historic language that targets and targeted blacks with a purpose— to illuminate the macabre that is Europeans colonial legacy.

If Kliff Kingsburry is not the most glaring example of majority-group affirmative action (aka the status quo hiring practices used across the country), then what is?

So many simple statements made to support the apartheid state of Israel.

I think the pro-Israeli community can get away with white washing any of Israel’s crimes against humanity by the sheer ignorance Americans have regarding the Israeli apartheid/occupation. For what Dr. Hill means to the black community, there should have been a significant uproar about his dismissal at CNN. A people…

...”we really have to redress past grievances in terms of how we addressed the African-American community”

content removed

Thanks for the clarification. I didn’t know that was aggravated assault. Using that definition, when people have guns pointed at them by officers for simple traffic arrests, would that fit the bill of being aggravated assault?

This type of reporting is the most powerful weapon against police violence.

Do ‘regional militants’ have a monopoly on the phrase“river to sea”? Or has that been used on college campuses as a rallying cry for Palestinian equality “river to sea, we’ll be free!”

So are you just going to conveniently ignore the fact that he was fired because he openly, in that speech, supported the BDS movement and that alone has been used as justification to label someone antisemitic?