If the Senator cannot distinguish the difference between real life, video games, and movies, perhaps he ought to not be writing legislation for them? Perhaps he should find someone that is more in touch with reality.

That argument would make sense, if there was a Monster Hunter available on PC, 360, or PS3.

You didn't get a license for it, Intel.

Yes. The Jaggi are quite nice at showing that law to you.

Then sadly, it doesn't fill the criterion I want for a Monster Hunter game. Tired of playing with low-resolution screens.

Of which I've never heard of, or seen marketed here in the States.

One thing I don't like about most mech games is that there's no sense of weight anymore. Momentum practically doesn't exist. Chromehounds was absolutely wonderful as it felt more like mobile artillery/cannon platforms. Sure Mechwarrior Online does "okay" but it's still too quick too. Hawken just doesn't feel right…

I actually own a disc of that game.

I've been wanting a Monster Hunter game on the PC for more than a few years now! I hate having to hold my 3DS in such a hand-cramping manner, and my Wii isn't exactly HD either. ($350 for a Wii U is too much as a barrier to entry.)

I don't think it just European teams, and even then it doesn't matter. This kind of behavior is disappointing in any direction.

It would be really disappointing if it were traced to a sore losing team.

The whole point of the scene was to make people feel uncomfortable. Remember that games are also there to push and prod at various things, to get people out of their comfort zones too.

First of all, this company wasn't the first one to let you buy the game in alpha/beta to help them to finance the development (typical example: minecraft ), but demanding a higher price than the one that the game will have when it will be ready, have all its features, that's ridiculous.

Are you serious? Small company (that needs whatever money they can get during development), a game that will for the most part not have invasive DRM (people argue Steam, but that's another point..)

One of the things I kind of liked so far during the alpha is that I found myself naturally gravitating towards trying to get things to run smoothly. Punishment wasn't in the forefront of my mind, but merely trying to keep things up and running and prisoners at least content.

I've always hated that "8" is good. When people ask me my opinions on games, I typically don't use a scale, but when they press me, I explain to them carefully that half on whatever scale I'm using is average. It's middle-of-the-road, neither good or bad.

To be fair, the NA servers have issues too. Not to the same degree, but I witness friends (and some customers) getting stuck in login queues or dealing with disconnects as a result of server stability.

Hopefully we can see more trials regarding things like this. It's taken awhile for enforcement to catch up.

Irrelevant if EA is based in the US. The company operates in America, therefore fits the criterion "In America" regardless of votes outside of the country.

People seem to forget, the poll is a light-hearted, not-so-serious one. It's a case of EA not only representing itself, but the game industry as a whole. EA has done some very bad business moves and while Bank of America has done some bad things for SOME people, they don't have the same reach as EA when it comes to…