In legalese, this document only serves to highlight the trade-dress issue that Apple is focusing on, far from a "smoking gun", this is merely the unstitched leather that makes up the gun holster. So it's worth in the outcome of the trial is only to influence the jury in the overall big picture, when they begin to…

you are trying to reason with people who think the law functions the same way it does on primetime television.

dont you dare question Gizmodo! infidel! All these google products are crap and useless, gmail? wtf is that? who on earth sends mail through the internet? useless! Cloud storage? cloud office editing software? no one except for businesses and online companies use it. Web search? what do we need to search the web for?…

True, anyone who thinks this is a smoking gun, obviously needs to understand that the actual legal system doesn't work like an episode of Law and Order.

as a connoisseur of how the legal system "Actually" works, this is nothing, and could end up having very little legal bearing in this case. I've seen even more damning evidence, end up being nothing more than a footnote.

there is only one thing you should be a belieber in, and that is the Bieber.

Jeebus inbred power!!

Well, choice is always good. Especially when you're possibly the only carrier left that doesn't carry the iPhone. Even the Galaxy s2 and s3 is on all 4 of the major carriers. But I guess, i can't blame t-mo for that, their frequency just doesn't support the iPhone, and it's easier to make an iPhone compatible with…

availability?

HTML5

i knew that. i was just too lazy to do it.

if you were previously logged into a hotmail or live account, try signing out before you go to the outlook sign up page

is it is sign of how low on the priority list microsoft mail has become to people, that we were able to get first name only accounts for half the people in my section, without even hurrying?

what old address?

that's racist and elitist.

Boom! done and done! @outlook.com, not that i'm ever going to use it anytime soon, maybe in a few years. but it's pretty.

maybe, but the access is still there. That means if you have broadband, you can watch it. Having broadband, but not the content to utilize it, like we have here is useless (in the context of olympics only, i know there is other content).

I wish there were good things that didn't depend on my facebook or twitter integration. I just barely tolerate facebook, because lots of people i know are on it, but the last thing i want to do is integrate more with it.

definitely clooney, adam west never had the latex moulded cowl.

sure buddy, whatever helps you sleep at night. and whatever wet dreams you have about star wars circle jerks, keep them to yourself, no one's interested.