FORBCO UNIVERSITY?!?!? LOLOLOLOL.!

Republican North Dakota Rep. Kevin Cramer was pretty tweaked by the idea of Democratic women wearing white to last night’s joint session. “It is a syndrome. There is no question, there is a disease associated with the notion that a bunch of women would wear bad-looking white pantsuits in solidarity with Hillary…

As a vet myself this is something everyone needs to understand: sometimes American Soldiers die for no good reason. They die in accidents, in blue-on-blue attacks, from improper medical care, in stupid wars, in badly planned missions. It happens. “Soldiers have died” is not a reason to keep fighting in and of itself.

The family of the vet does get to make a choice. Owens’ wife made one choice (yes, you can use me as a prop); his father made another (GTFO you moron whose idiotic decision got my son killed).

Trotting out the military as props is like Politics 101. Their families are inherently sympathetic, and Soldiers get virtually no say in what they are told to do (if someone tells them to go stand next to the President and have him pin on an award, that’s what they do). Plus politicians can funnel all sorts of money…

You’re correct. No one who is criticizing Trump for this stunt also criticized Hillary for her stunt. You are clearly the smartest person in this room.

As long as you can get American soldiers killed, you will always have defenders, because there will always be people who think saying that American soldiers were sent somewhere to die for no good reason is more offensive than sending American soldiers somewhere to die for no good reason.

If they know what they’re doing (HAHAHA) never. Nothing rallies up opposition to a war faster than conscription.

Ah, the hypocrisy is thick. Remember when he went after the Khan family and accused HRC of using them as a political prop? Fun times, man. Fun times.

Chris Cilizza is consistently and dangerously moronic. But “Donald Trump understood the applause for Carryn Owens was a moment. And he let it be.” is simply wrong.

My issue isn’t with giving her that platform. What happened to her husband is a tragedy, and she should get more attention. My issue is with Van Jones describing Trump’s comments as a historic moment, or what makes Trump presidential.

I said this on another thread, but I’ll repeat it here:

Especially disappointing that it comes from Van. Don Lemon, I could see, but Van Jones? Come on, man. After all that Trump has said and done in the past month in office and the past year on the campaign trail? One speech erases all of that? That’s pretty goddamned disappointing.

A week or so ago Van Jones came out on Twitter as an Assad supporter, so naturally he’s also okay with the budding tyrant Trump.

The fawning over this speech by the pundits is just vomit inducing. Van Jones just declared Trump’s shout out to the Yemen raid soldier’s widow one of the greatest moments in presidential speech history, and his ticket to being a two term president. I think his exact words were “He became president of the United…

The universe is off its axis when the most effective troller of Trump is the former right-of-center president of Mexico.

After reading tweets from Katy Tur, Van Jones, Zeke Miller, Chris Cilliza and hearing about Chris Matthews all lauding him for sounding presidential with a capital P, Vincente Fox’s tweets softened the blow of the impending rise in approval ratings.

I think Jews for Trump is done for Jews, rather than by Jews.

wow, fuck that guy

A couple of things.