fr33kye
PlatinumGraves
fr33kye

The video's wrong and way off base. It misses the actual obstacles for the vita, and somehow fails to notice that out of those 15 games shown to express how much more 3ds games there are on the shelves, 10/15 are published by nintendo. The 3ds's support primarily comes from nintendo published games, and japanese

It's not that big of leap for them to want a laid back character to represent the island and to contrast with Tidus's fish out of water experience, alongside all the other people of the island. It's not a huge leap to make. It's a bigger leap to say that one character, the only character of his kind, represents what

And it's important to note Waka's the only islander who talks that way. So really if we are treating the islanders as an the developers interpretation of the Polynesian people, Waka is just one guy.

Maybe Waka's speech is just an expression of his personality rather than the developers idea of what people on islands are like?

Aiming a handheld at console gamers was a bad idea in the first place. It's a great handheld but console gamers have never been the primary audience for handhelds. Console gamers aren't going to buy a brand new console for uglier versions of games they already have access to. The big sony games don't do as well as

That would've been pretty freakin cool, huh?

Poorly positioned handheld, incredible design. A clear sign that everyone at sony who isn't designing hardware and on third party teams, have no idea what they're doing.

This account should get a kickstarter.

Mobile to console gaming is too big a leap. They don't have the skills necessary, and it's an expensive jump.

It's very true that mobile to home consoles is way too big of a leap. They just wouldn't have the skills to just jump into console gaming. Really handhelds are supposed to be that middleground. Sony built the better handheld for that middleground but tried to sell it to the wrong people and have an image problem as

QUOTE | "I was so fed up of people telling us we should do free-to-fucking-play, in-app-fucking purchases, whatever the fuck that is, and that consoles were dead. So fuck all of those people and their fucking shitty stance." - Graeme Struthers of Devolver, talking about why he's happy to see next-gen consoles doing

White girls are always more important than black people man chill, even if she wasn't already a character in SS there wouldn't be a controversy.

QUOTE | "I think that's actually the biggest star to help provide great content to Vita going forward." - Sony worldwide studios president Shuhei Yoshida referring to the indie scene and talking about why we'll see fewer dedicated first-party games on the PS Vita.

They're not making a bunch of games. Over my dead body and freedom wars are both third party I believe. There may be some collaboration but they aren't first party titles.

You're gonna have to link me to that, can't find it. Sounds shook by the controversy of what he thought was a normal statement :p . So....there's a third option? 1. They told the truth the first time and got shook. 2. They're lying cuz of sexism. 3. They want to keep it about Arno and he thought the first answer would

Slow yourself, I never said games with women don't sell and Liberation is proof. My point is that Liberation sold about what you'd expect of an AC spinoff, maybe less, and showed no indication of a desperate desire for a female assassin. My point , is that the controversy surrounding this, isn't actually about any

"Are we entitled to a more balanced game roster?" My point is that we aren't entitled to anything other than the decision to purchase or not to purchase.

Yes. He's an animator, not a producer, an animator and he was commenting not on how long it would take to add a female character, but how long he thinks it would take to adjust a character to fit the animations. Not on the entire process.

The game sold less than half what AC games sell, even after it was ported. I remember that one article on kotaku. This issue has already gotten several articles on more than a few sites, and a twitter campaign.

Yes but I assumed that the original poster made that post because that ONE female character, runs counter to the narrative that ubisoft is opposed to having women in game rather than the reason they gave. One game or two games, 10% or 20%, there's not enough evidence supporting the idea that they are opposed to female