I beat the game back when it was still “new”, so no, I did play it at the time. If I had had absolutely anything else to play at the time, I would have just dropped the game altogether.

Not really sure where you’re getting System Shock, but it doesn’t look like either game. IIRC, XCOM Declassified originally was an FPS that had you fighting very similar black blobs and they scrapped the idea because they just weren’t very fun enemies to fight...so I’m wondering how it will be any better here.

It is useful for console gamers because they can get mods and becasue the PS3 version was terrible, but for PC gamers...you can just download mods to make the game look better. But since they’re giving it out for free if you have the DLC/legendary edition, I can’t really complain about it.

Because it was a mediocre game? I’m not even sure why they’d want to connect something that looks obviously superior to something that was so sub par.

Technically they told the truth. Should have asked if they were working on a Prey game at all.

Yes it is. And *physical* TCG are expensive as hell, but most of the video game ones you don’t have to spend money on if you don’t want. I’ve been playing Hearthstone for a while and haven’t spent a dime.

The problem with that scchedule is you’re leaving out the Fallout games, which they now make. So it is more like this:

I don’t think they felt similar at all. Mass Effect 3 had a few hub areas, but other than that, it was mission-based. Dragon Age Inquistion was more about having “exploration” but it didn’t have much of interest to explore. It also stopped you from progressing until you did enough menial tasks (claiming camps, closing…

Really?... Fallout 4 came out like half a year ago. They’ve had gaps of 2-4 years between their games.

As much as I hated the ME3 ending, that isn’t what has me worried about Andromeda. It is Dragon Age Inquisition that has me worried about this. Both games are going for the “open world exploration” and, in theory, that would be great in ME:A (more fleshed out than ME1), but DA:I handled it so incredibly poorly, that…

It isn’t really a mystery unless we forget that stock photo thing ever happened (though they are described in the books).

The one in the armor from the first trailer was clearly male, I’m thinking either that’s a side character or they’re going to promote with both (which is probably what they will d0). I don’t think that is how they’d reveal the main character, though... in an out of context scene in a behind-the-scenes video.

While that would be preferred, I’m just glad to see any in-game footage at all...

Isn’t this an extremely basic thing taught in drivers ed....?

A GTX 970 is 300$, what 2 game consoles would he be buying with that?

Kill...Zone? doesn’t ring any bells.

From what I’ve seen on forums, people are mad about it being a requirement for the CoD4 remaster, so I’m going to wager a guess that it’s a major factor here.

The company would have to get authorities involved and obviously this company wasn't going to do that. But sure, if you want hyperbole stars, I guess.

There is a ring that does nothing but raise poise. Why would they keep that in the game, then? Or any mention of the stat to begin with?